Bugs item #747, was opened at 2007-03-09 04:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=747&group_id=106 Category: hz Group: v1.40.1 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert (schlcht) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: \letterspacefont and \pdffontexpand, again Initial Comment: When expanding a letterspaced font, the base font will be expanded, too, resulting in the error `font has been expanded with different parameters' when the base font is expanded again: \letterspacefont\lsfont\font 100 \pdffontexpand\lsfont 20 20 5 autoexpand \pdffontexpand\font 20 20 5 autoexpand Z\bye ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Taco Hoekwater (taco) Date: 2007-06-28 09:37

Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1608 That sounds nice, I like it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2007-06-28 08:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 I agree this is an ugly solution, which has its origin in a design mistake. However the problem here is not only how to deal with the error message, but the point is how to use font expansion with a letterspaced font. Please give it a thought so we can come up with an acceptable workaround. If we want everything to be clean, there are more things that have to be thrown away. what about this: have a primitive \copyfont which creates a copy of a font. Example: \letterspacefont\lsfont\font 100 \copyfont\lsxfont\lsfont \pdffontexpand\lsxfont 20 20 5 autoexpand ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Taco Hoekwater (taco) Date: 2007-06-27 13:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1608 If there is no clean way of solving the problem, I'd rather just document the error message as a feature. I find \pdfnewexpandfont very ugly (sorry Thanh). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2007-06-24 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 here is a patch that introduces a new primitive \pdfnewexpandfont. Usage: \font\f=cmr10 \pdfnewexpandfont\fx \f 20 20 5 autoexpand Note that \pdfnewexpandfont generates \fx by loading a TFM corresponding to \f first, then applies font expansion in the same way like "\pdffontexpand\fx 20 20 5". So when \f is a font that doesn't have a corresponding TFM (for example, because it was generated in pdftex memory only), the above command won't work. In particular, the following doesn't work: \font\f=cmr10 \letterspacefont\lsfont\f 100 \pdfnewexpandfont\fx \lsfont 20 20 5 autoexpand since \lsfont doesn't have a corresponding TFM but was generated by \letterspacefont. To create a letterspaced+expanded font, one can use: \font\f=cmr10 \letterspacefont\fx\f 100 \pdffontexpand\fx 20 20 5 autoexpand things are gettting messy... sorry about that. Testing/comments welcome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert (schlcht) Date: 2007-04-01 02:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2217 Fine for me and microtype. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2007-03-31 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 either name is ok with me. We need a new pritimive to load a new font and expand it, since the current one doesn't load a new font and hence is making trouble. I would wait for a while to see how Robert sees it before making any change. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody (None) Date: 2007-03-19 12:07 Message: Logged In: NO Hello, I do not think that \pdfexpandfont is a good name for a new primitive, as it is too easy to confuse with \pdffontexpand. What about \pdfexpandnewfont, as -- if I understand correctly -- a new font is loaded? Jonathan P.S: Thank you for creating pdfTeX! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2007-03-10 21:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 Phil Taylor has a suggestion that seems great to me: introduce a new primitive \pdfexpandfont instead. How do you see it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2007-03-10 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 Forget that comment. Of course a change of \pdffontexpand has to be considered carefully. By you. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2007-03-10 20:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 No. It's an undocumented primitive. ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2007-03-09 18:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 sigh. A mistake when implementing the \pdffontexpand primitive: it should load a new font for expansion, instead of expanding a loaded font. Too late for change now? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=747&group_id=106