stream BT /F1 11.9552 Tf 280.537 760.6529 Td[(1)]TJ -209.67 -58.2684 Td[(test:)]TJ ET endstream this extra empty line looks like a 'bug' to me (only latest version) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-01-06 02:13:48 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
stream BT /F1 11.9552 Tf 280.537 760.6529 Td[(1)]TJ -209.67 -58.2684 Td[(test:)]TJ ET
endstream
this extra empty line looks like a 'bug' to me (only latest version)
In my interpretation of the spec this is perfectly legal; the stream has an extra newline. :-) If you have a simple test case, please file a bug report at sarovar (attach the source and the pdf please). Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, ms@artcom-gmbh.de ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 http://www.artcom-gmbh.de
Martin Schröder wrote:
In my interpretation of the spec this is perfectly legal; the stream has an extra newline. :-) If you have a simple test case, please file a bug report at sarovar (attach the source and the pdf please).
sure, but it looks horrible on the pdftex manual's frontpage -) so ... maybe hartmut sees it as a challenge -) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
In my interpretation of the spec this is perfectly legal; the stream has an extra newline. :-) If you have a simple test case, please file a bug report at sarovar (attach the source and the pdf please).
sure, but it looks horrible on the pdftex manual's frontpage -)
damn horrible indeed :-)
so ... maybe hartmut sees it as a challenge -)
:-) Maybe reason is that some time ago i asked Thanh to put endstreams at start of lines, just for better legibility. But as the things before endstream have different origins, to make it really clean one would maybe have to check whether the character before already was a 0x0a. Anyway, yes, it seems to be legal. Regards, Hartmut
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:16:53PM +0100, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
In my interpretation of the spec this is perfectly legal; the stream has an extra newline. :-) If you have a simple test case, please file a bug report at sarovar (attach the source and the pdf please).
sure, but it looks horrible on the pdftex manual's frontpage -)
damn horrible indeed :-)
so ... maybe hartmut sees it as a challenge -)
:-) Maybe reason is that some time ago i asked Thanh to put endstreams at start of lines, just for better legibility. But as the things before endstream have different origins, to make it really clean one would maybe have to check whether the character before already was a 0x0a. Anyway, yes, it seems to be legal.
yes that's the reason. We should add some checking whether the last char is 10 before adding a new line before 'endstream' Regards, Thanh
participants (4)
-
Hans Hagen -
Hartmut Henkel -
Martin Schröder -
The Thanh Han