Hi, the libpng-version we use has a security problem which is fixed in a new version (1.2.12). I'm contemplating doing a new release of 1.30 (1.30.7) incorporating this before leaving for Debrecen on Tuesday. Anything else that _must_ go in? Best Martin
� wrote:
Hi, the libpng-version we use has a security problem which is fixed in a
you mean a bug; i always wonder why bugs are called security problem / fix; maybe because it sounds friendlier (since such risks originat efrom the outside world) -) as usual, go ahead! Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen
� wrote:
Hi, the libpng-version we use has a security problem which is fixed in a
you mean a bug; i always wonder why bugs are called security problem / fix; maybe because it sounds friendlier (since such risks originat efrom the outside world) -)
I think they are treated as a security issue if they allow a DoS attack or executing malicious code etc. It doesn't sound friendlier to me at all. A normal bug should be fixed, yes; but it doesn't make sense to backport all fixes for bugs found so far into a stable release. If it's a security issue, it generally makes sense. In this particular case, I don't know about the impact of the problem, and I personally don't care since we (Debian) compile --with-system-pnglib and therefore get the update automatically. Regards, -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
Frank Küster wrote:
I think they are treated as a security issue if they allow a DoS attack or executing malicious code etc. It doesn't sound friendlier to me at all. A normal bug should be fixed, yes; but it doesn't make sense to backport all fixes for bugs found so far into a stable release. If it's a security issue, it generally makes sense.
In the case of pdftex, I would be more worried about real bugs. The chance of a malicious PNG image accidentally appearing in a document that will be processed by pdftex is very low. OTOH, the chance of a pdfTeX user hitting one of the 'normal' bugs and thereby suffering actual consequences (missed deadlines, lost assignments, discouraged clients) are probably a whole lot higher. If there is a new version, it should be integrated regardless. Taco
On 6/29/06, Frank Küster
the libpng-version we use has a security problem which is fixed in a
I think they are treated as a security issue if they allow a DoS attack or executing malicious code etc. It doesn't sound friendlier to me at all. A normal bug should be fixed, yes; but it doesn't make sense to backport all fixes for bugs found so far into a stable release. If it's a security issue, it generally makes sense.
In this particular case, I don't know about the impact of the problem, and I personally don't care since we (Debian) compile --with-system-pnglib and therefore get the update automatically.
Most linux distributions will compile using "--with-system-pnglib" anyway.
In Fedora Core 4 I see;
$ ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex | grep libpng
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0
People who need to worry about security shouldn't rely on the pdftex
developers to provide new binaries.
--
George N. White III
� wrote:
2006/6/29, George N. White III
: Most linux distributions will compile using "--with-system-pnglib" anyway. In Fedora Core 4 I see;
Same on SuSE 10.1
So, no 1.30.7 :-)
hm, i hope that tex live keeps shipping static binaries, i hate such dependencies (i love the idea to copy just a binary when i install a fresh copy of tex on a linux box using an existing box) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen
� wrote:
2006/6/29, George N. White III
: Most linux distributions will compile using "--with-system-pnglib" anyway. In Fedora Core 4 I see;
Same on SuSE 10.1
So, no 1.30.7 :-)
hm, i hope that tex live keeps shipping static binaries,
I guess so, but then texlive has never issued security updates, has it? I also agree with Taco that security bugs in TeX are mostly not relevant, while real bugs are. It's more that distributors want to have a reputation of fixing security issues promptly (which is in fact important for server software etc.) and cannot or don't want to distinguish between important ones and less important ones. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
� wrote:
Hi, the libpng-version we use has a security problem which is fixed in a new version (1.2.12). I'm contemplating doing a new release of 1.30 (1.30.7) incorporating this before leaving for Debrecen on Tuesday.
btw, aren't we in release 1.40? (at least that's what my system reports), so why not do an 'eurotex release' i.e. 1.40 (no beta) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (5)
-
Frank Küster
-
George N. White III
-
Hans Hagen
-
Martin Schröder
-
Taco Hoekwater