Patches item #709, was opened at 2006-12-04 08:21 You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=495&aid=709&group_id=106 Category: Fonts Group: v1.40.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Hartmut Henkel (hhenkel) Summary: merging patch 597 by Hartmut Initial Comment: This is a patch against pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061018 that merges patch 597 by Hartmut and does some clean up in the font mechanism. Testing welcome very much. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2006-12-04 13:25
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 are you saying that you have troubles applying the patch against pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061017? Can you please try to apply against pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061018? I have checked everything again from the beginning as follows: - download and unpack http://sarovar.org/download.php/1100/pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061017.tar.bz2 - download, ungzip and apply http://sarovar.org/download.php/1108/pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061017-20061108.di... - download http://sarovar.org/tracker/download.php/106/495/709/237/pdftex-20061204-2.pa... - cd /path/to/pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061017/src - patch -p1 --dry-run /path/to/pdftex-20061204-2.patch The patch applied ok, apart from change-files.txt (I removed it from pdftexdir, as it's no longer relevant to pdftex). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2006-12-04 12:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 I'm having troubles applying pdftex-20061204-2.patch against pdftex-1.40.0-beta-20061017, especially pdftex.web. Can you attach a diff against 1.40.0-beta-20061108 or your patched pdftex.web? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2006-12-04 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=710 I updated the patch to revert auto kerns to be explicit. This will disable hyphenation if auto kern is used. On the other hand this is much more robust. The pending problems are: bug #693: still trying bug #484: will not be fixed, better treat it as a limitation bug #465: unlikely to be fixed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=495&aid=709&group_id=106