Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
In good old days we had pdfxtex. Why can't we have it again? It was a great thing for experimental stuff.
But nothing seems to gets noticed until it is in the mainstream
application (and no longer marked experimental), so having a
separate pdfxtex quite likely will not help. I am not against
reviving pdfxtex, but I doubt there is much to be gained from it.
We spent the better part of yesterday talking about a primitive
that has been published a year and a half ago, and whose tracker
item has been closed since may 2005. That is hardly indicative of
an active beta-tester base.
Also, \quitvmode is not superfluous except under etex. So:
"Vladimir" == Vladimir Volovich
at least please avoid adding new unnecessary primitives in the future. :)
I vote for the removal of \indent since it is not needed in etex. We can patch plain.ini to contain its definition as a \protected macro. :-) Cheers, Taco