On Jun 26, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> wrote:
4) For the ligatures, I can't remember for sure, but I suspect that the
entries predate the existence of the ligatures in Unicode.
It is not
clear to me that the change is desirable, because the "decomposition"
into two f characters is what is actually desired for searches, etc.
If you can convince Eddie, fine; it's up to him. A practical usage
case is probably needed for that. The current entries have been around
a long, long, time and should not be changed merely to "follow" Unicode.
5) Regarding your previous message about Delta(greek).
glyphtounicode.tex generally follows Adobe's original glyphlist.txt
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/opentype/glyphlist.txt
which has the same Delta + Deltagreek definitions. Which are more
useful in practice. I can't imagine there will or should be any changes
there.
5b) I note that glyphlist.txt does have the FB0* for the f-ligatures.
I don't know if we intentionally diverged from that for TeX.
6) If you want to make changes for your own purposes, you can just make
your own version of the file.
Hope this helps,
Karl
Mathematics Dept | Level 2, S2.638 AHH
Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
T: +61 2 9850 8955 | F: +61
2 9850 8114
M:+61 407 288 255 | E: ross.moore@mq.edu.au