![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Chris Rowley wrote:
Oh well, I never expect to see anything reasonable from maths on screen (and I spend a lot of time staring at just that right now as i am busy editing loads of it!).
i hope fo ryou that in that case they gave you a 1920x1200 screen to work with since i'm not that sure if a ten-deep-nested root on a 80 char width page is that readable at all on the average screen
But I agree that missing fraction bars can be a nightmare, especially in combinatorial number theory:-)
in that case, i think that they are never missing, but just taking 15 pixels width instead of a few (ok, by making that rule transparent you can see through and still see the numbers that it covers -)
and then there is everyone else's stategies!!
lucky you that everyone is using tex for math, which is still better than staring at some presentation mathml rendered in a browser using funny symbols, scaling etc maybe, just as math visualization was adapted to paper / print, you need to adapt it for the screen /pdf; could be a nice talk of you for some tex conference: the New Math Visualization project (i bet that the EU will fund it esp when you mention that it serves the big ones like MS and Adobe) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------