12 Dec
2004
12 Dec
'04
5:14 a.m.
Hartmut's patch in all likelyhood solves the entire issue: there are not that many 'potentially problematic' variables in writet1.c, so the chance that he missed one is quite slim.
Maybe, I totally miss the point, but since the patch sets T1_BUF_SIZE to 0x10 (which is a setting that shall trigger reallocations very often, I guess?), shouldn't it be sufficient to typeset a number of documents or a few large documents and preview and print? I mean, if T1_BUF_SIZE would have a value that makes reallocations happen seldomly, I'd agree that testing is not easy, but in this case!? Thomas