17 Feb
2006
17 Feb
'06
10:38 a.m.
Martin Schröder writes:
On 2006-02-16 19:52:52 +0100, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
TeXk is there since it is a modified TeX and therefore (i guess) it had to be given a different name.
Does a similar formal or other reason exist for pdfTeXk vs. pdfTeX?
At least the comments
@x [1] m.2 l.188 - Web2C: extensions imply we're not pdfeTeX @x [1] m.2 l.188 - Web2C: extensions imply we're not pdfTeX
don't make sense to me anymore.
Olaf?
It was put in for consistency with the other flavours; I don't particularly care one way or the other. -- Olaf Weber (This space left blank for technical reasons.)