![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/adfff96f4299fb3ee3b199b06eea68da.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Bugs item #389, was opened at 2005-07-14 08:34 You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=389&group_id=106 Category: Literals Group: v1.30.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hartmut Henkel (hhenkel) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: Spacing Bug with \pdfliteral direct Initial Comment: "\pdfliteral direct" screws up spacing. Hans found it. Therefore one has to use the non-direct variant e. g. for changing color in text, which results in tedious transforms. The trivial patch seems to solve this. Now it's possible to define color "direct". See the test.pdf file. Actually i don't understand at all what the patch does, but it seemed to be the only place where the literal interferes with position calculations. It seems that the patch does not mangle the horizontal positioning calculation; see the placement of the \vrule after the ET, which is independent from whether \pdfliteral direct is used or not. Rough patch. Tests welcome. Regards, Hartmut ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Taco Hoekwater (taco) Date: 2005-07-14 10:28
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1608 I did some extra tests with spaces around the grey text, and it output turned out ok. I don't understand this trickery with pdf_first_space_corr at all, but since it seems to work i'm reluctant to spend an indeterminate amount of time on discovering the intent of it. Patch looks good, afaict. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=389&group_id=106