10 Aug
2003
10 Aug
'03
3:32 p.m.
On 2003-08-09 20:48:35 +0200, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:53:24AM +0200, Martin Schroeder wrote:
This also falls into the category of non-pdf extensions, which would best be done with eTeX. If eTeX would evolve, that is. :-(
Similar problem with \(pdf)shellescape*. We can wait many years for the best names and solutions or do it know in the \pdf-namespace.
I'll ask Peter if there is any chance of progess for eTeX. Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, MS@ArtCom-GmbH.DE ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10