- ntg-pdftex - NTG Mailing Lists

[pdftex-Bugs][4321] Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 25 Nov '10

25 Nov '10

Bugs item #4321, was opened at 2010-11-25 15:21 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: Hello, pdfTeX complains Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap for valid cmap entries, when a PDF file is included. The CMap entries are, for example: 1 beginbfrange <0041><0041><0041> endbfrange The error disappears in case of 1 beginbfrange <41><41><0041> endbfrange The error is in function CharCodeToUnicode::parseCMap1 in file libs/xpdf-3.02/xpdf/CharCodeToUnicode.cc In case of poppler the problem is already reported with patch: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler-bugs/2010-April/004931.html The appended test file can be processed by "pdftex --ini", "pdftex" or "pdflatex". Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4321&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4315] pdftex manual is not up-to-date
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 16 Nov '10

16 Nov '10

Bugs item #4315, was opened at 2010-07-30 08:49 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: pdftex manual is not up-to-date Category: Documentation Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: The manual needs some correction: \pdfelapsedtime: poor wording \letterspacefont: missing \pdfinclusioncopyfonts: missing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2010-11-16 22:50 Message: FYI: The manual in the qstex branch has some updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-09-17 09:05 Message: \pdfstrcmp: missing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4315&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4319] jbig2 resolution
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 10 Nov '10

10 Nov '10

Support Requests item #4319, was opened at 2010-11-06 13:18 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Boris Okun (okun) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: jbig2 resolution Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: When including a jbig2enc generated file, the x,y-resolutions seem to be completely off. I think the problem is with the lines 701-702 in writejbig2.c img_xres(img) = (int) (pip->xres * 0.0254 + 0.5); img_yres(img) = (int) (pip->yres * 0.0254 + 0.5); The file has resolution set to 600dpi, according to my hex browser, if I manually change it to 600/0.0254=2362, I get the expected output. Or, perhaps, I and/or jbig2enc misunderstand the format of jbig2 files. Thanks, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Boris Okun (okun) Date: 2010-11-09 19:43 Message: Hartmut, Thank you for the exhaustive explanation. It looks like a bug in jbig2enc. Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hartmut Henkel (hhenkel) Date: 2010-11-09 14:59 Message: The parameters img_xres(img) and img_yres(img) are handled in pixels/inch within pdftex (see also calculations for PNG ang JPG images). The JBIG2 standard (file fcd14492.pdf) specifies in section 7.4.8.3 and 7.4.8.4 that the resolution must be stated in pixels/meter (not inch!). You expect your JBIG2 file to have a resolution of 600 dpi; when you divide by 0.0254, you get pixels/meter. So in your JBIG2 file there should indeed be 23622 as resolution, not 600. It looks as if there is some calculation bug when generating the JBIG2 file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Boris Okun (okun) Date: 2010-11-08 08:14 Message: I am attaching: original: tetra.tiff compressed: jbig2 -s tetra.tiff > tetra.jbig2 tex: tetra.tex Thanks for looking into this, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-11-08 06:26 Message: can you please attach the image? Regards, Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4319&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4319] jbig2 resolution
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 09 Nov '10

09 Nov '10

Support Requests item #4319, was opened at 2010-11-06 19:18 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Boris Okun (okun) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: jbig2 resolution Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: When including a jbig2enc generated file, the x,y-resolutions seem to be completely off. I think the problem is with the lines 701-702 in writejbig2.c img_xres(img) = (int) (pip->xres * 0.0254 + 0.5); img_yres(img) = (int) (pip->yres * 0.0254 + 0.5); The file has resolution set to 600dpi, according to my hex browser, if I manually change it to 600/0.0254=2362, I get the expected output. Or, perhaps, I and/or jbig2enc misunderstand the format of jbig2 files. Thanks, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hartmut Henkel (hhenkel) Date: 2010-11-09 21:59 Message: The parameters img_xres(img) and img_yres(img) are handled in pixels/inch within pdftex (see also calculations for PNG ang JPG images). The JBIG2 standard (file fcd14492.pdf) specifies in section 7.4.8.3 and 7.4.8.4 that the resolution must be stated in pixels/meter (not inch!). You expect your JBIG2 file to have a resolution of 600 dpi; when you divide by 0.0254, you get pixels/meter. So in your JBIG2 file there should indeed be 23622 as resolution, not 600. It looks as if there is some calculation bug when generating the JBIG2 file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Boris Okun (okun) Date: 2010-11-08 15:14 Message: I am attaching: original: tetra.tiff compressed: jbig2 -s tetra.tiff > tetra.jbig2 tex: tetra.tex Thanks for looking into this, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-11-08 13:26 Message: can you please attach the image? Regards, Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4319&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4319] jbig2 resolution
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Support Requests item #4319, was opened at 2010-11-06 13:18 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Boris Okun (okun) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: jbig2 resolution Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: When including a jbig2enc generated file, the x,y-resolutions seem to be completely off. I think the problem is with the lines 701-702 in writejbig2.c img_xres(img) = (int) (pip->xres * 0.0254 + 0.5); img_yres(img) = (int) (pip->yres * 0.0254 + 0.5); The file has resolution set to 600dpi, according to my hex browser, if I manually change it to 600/0.0254=2362, I get the expected output. Or, perhaps, I and/or jbig2enc misunderstand the format of jbig2 files. Thanks, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Boris Okun (okun) Date: 2010-11-08 08:14 Message: I am attaching: original: tetra.tiff compressed: jbig2 -s tetra.tiff > tetra.jbig2 tex: tetra.tex Thanks for looking into this, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-11-08 06:26 Message: can you please attach the image? Regards, Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4319&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4320] DVI mode ignores draftmode
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Bugs item #4320, was opened at 2010-11-08 12:31 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: DVI mode ignores draftmode Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-pdftex/2010-November/003930.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4320&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4319] jbig2 resolution
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Support Requests item #4319, was opened at 2010-11-06 18:18 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Boris Okun (okun) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: jbig2 resolution Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: When including a jbig2enc generated file, the x,y-resolutions seem to be completely off. I think the problem is with the lines 701-702 in writejbig2.c img_xres(img) = (int) (pip->xres * 0.0254 + 0.5); img_yres(img) = (int) (pip->yres * 0.0254 + 0.5); The file has resolution set to 600dpi, according to my hex browser, if I manually change it to 600/0.0254=2362, I get the expected output. Or, perhaps, I and/or jbig2enc misunderstand the format of jbig2 files. Thanks, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-11-08 12:26 Message: can you please attach the image? Regards, Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4319&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4319] jbig2 resolution
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 06 Nov '10

06 Nov '10

Support Requests item #4319, was opened at 2010-11-06 13:18 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Boris Okun (okun) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: jbig2 resolution Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: When including a jbig2enc generated file, the x,y-resolutions seem to be completely off. I think the problem is with the lines 701-702 in writejbig2.c img_xres(img) = (int) (pip->xres * 0.0254 + 0.5); img_yres(img) = (int) (pip->yres * 0.0254 + 0.5); The file has resolution set to 600dpi, according to my hex browser, if I manually change it to 600/0.0254=2362, I get the expected output. Or, perhaps, I and/or jbig2enc misunderstand the format of jbig2 files. Thanks, Boris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4319&group_id=106

1 0

DVI mode ignores draftmode
by Heiko Oberdiek 05 Nov '10

05 Nov '10

Hello, draftmode in DVI mode ===================== the command line option --draftmode or the setting \pdfdraftmode=1 is not working in DVI mode, it is silently ignored. IMHO the best solution would be if --draftmode or \pdfdraftmode=1 is also respected in DVI mode. Otherwise a warning or error would be nice, e.g. * \pdfdraftmode cannot be used in DVI mode. Invalid value ============= BTW, setting \pdfdraftmode to an invalid value generates an error, but quite late and with wrong text: % pdftex --ini \catcode`\{=1 \catcode`\}=2 \pdfdraftmode=-1 \par \def\space{ } \immediate\write16{% \string\pdfdraftmode\space with invalid value: \number\pdfdraftmode } \shipout\hbox{} \end Result: (./test.tex \pdfdraftmode with invalid value: -1 ! pdfTeX error (setup): \pdfdraftmode can only be changed before anything is written to the output. l.10 \shipout\hbox{} ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! Transcript written on test.log. Yours sincerely Heiko Oberdiek --

1 0

Making pdftex-trunk/qstex compile again
by Martin Schröder 26 Oct '10

26 Oct '10

Hi, as you may have noticed, pdftex/trunk and pdftex/branches/qstex (which are still based on TL2007) don't compile anymore; on newer systems (newer then Ubuntu 8.04/SUSE 10.3) compilation breaks with -------------------------- srcdir=../../../src/texk/web2c /bin/sh ../../../src/texk/web2c/web2c/convert tangleboot gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/texk/web2c -I.. -I../../../src/texk/web2c/.. -I../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -I../../../src/texk/web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../../src/texk/web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g3 -O3 -Wall -Wno-write-strings -Wno-char-subscripts -c tangleboot.c -o tangleboot.o In file included from tangleboot.c:94: tangleboot.h:34: error: conflicting types for ‘getline’ /usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of ‘getline’ was here tangleboot.c: In function ‘zprefixlookup’: tangleboot.c:883: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c: In function ‘getoutput’: tangleboot.c:1009: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c: At top level: tangleboot.c:2175: error: conflicting types for ‘getline’ /usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of ‘getline’ was here tangleboot.c: In function ‘getnext’: tangleboot.c:2420: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c: In function ‘zscanrepl’: tangleboot.c:2921: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c:2935: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c:2962: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c:3156: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ tangleboot.c: In function ‘mainbody’: tangleboot.c:3483: warning: label ‘lab9999’ defined but not used make[1]: *** [tangleboot.o] Fehler 1 make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis '/home/mschroeder/pdftex/source/build/texk/web2c' make: *** [pdftexbin] Fehler 2 -------------------------- This is a well-known problem with recent glibc that's of course solved in stable, because that is based on TL2010. Fixing this is complicated by the fact that since the time trunk started rotting we got a new release of TeX, so a fix is much more complicated then copying pdftexdir into a TL2010 tree, as the old change files won't tangle anymore. :-( So my question is: Is there a minimal fix that fixes just the getline problem and makes trunk _as_is_ compile again? Thanks in advance Martin

2 2

[pdftex-Bugs][4315] pdftex manual is not up-to-date
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Bugs item #4315, was opened at 2010-07-30 06:49 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: pdftex manual is not up-to-date Category: Documentation Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: The manual needs some correction: \pdfelapsedtime: poor wording \letterspacefont: missing \pdfinclusioncopyfonts: missing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-09-17 07:05 Message: \pdfstrcmp: missing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4315&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Patches][2087] Support for CMap namespaces
by pdftex-patches＠sarovar.org 08 Sep '10

08 Sep '10

Patches item #2087, was opened at 2008-08-28 08:17 >Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Vasile Gaburici (vga) >Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: Support for CMap namespaces Category: Fonts Group: v1.40.0 Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: There are a couple of LaTeX packages out there (cmap and mmap) that provide CMaps. They don't work as well as \pdfglyphtounicode, i.e. virtual fonts don't get CMaps at all (the CMap is included in the PDF but not referenced), and otftotfm-installed fonts lack the CMap entries for the ligatures that otftotfm sneaks in empty slots. As you know, \pdfglyphtounicode fixes these problems. On the other hand, these two packages let the user specify a CMap for each LaTeX encoding, so the user ca give different Unicode values to the same PS glyph name in different LaTeX encodings. Of course that works properly only if the fonts invoked by the different LaTeX encodings are different; otherwise only one can win the \pdffontattr. A compelling application of this feature are CMaps that set math code points (usually above BMP) for TeX math fonts; those glyphs have exactly the same names as in text fonts /A etc. Adding namespaces to \pdfglyphtounicode makes those two packages obsolete in their current implementation. Another advantage of namespaces is the ability to (reliably) fix TrueType font CMaps. The troublesome glyphs are usually ligatures that don't have a Unicode entry (Th, ti, tf, ffb, etc.), which otftotfm writes as /indexZZZ in the enc file. Putting those in a per-font namespace avoids any potential clashes. So, I've patched pdftex to provide namespaces using the following syntax extension: the first argument of \pdfglyphtounicode can now take additional forms: \pdfglyphtounicode{fnt:tex-font-name/ps-glyph-name}{...} \pdfglyphtounicode{enc:ps-enc-name/ps-glyph-name}{...} Since fonts for which the built-in encoding is used happen to be exactly those that have multiple design sizes (cmr, stmary etc.), using a separate ps-enc-name for each is not helpful. Instead, the 'enc' namespace for those is obtained by dropping any final digits from the font name, e.g. cmr10 has PS encoding cmr (for CMap purposes only). The search policy is to first search the font namespce, then the encoding, and finally the global namespace, for which the syntax remains unchanged. All these namespace are implemented in the same avl tree; just using the above strings as key names. In theory this makes the search 3 times slower, but that particular phase of pdftex hardly takes any time, so it seemed premature to implement any optimization. Some usage examples: % make the ti ligature searchable in Calibri regular \pdfglyphtounicode{fnt:calibly1--base/index415}{0074 0069} % go crazy with Unicode math; TeX math italic gives above-BMP math A \pdfglyphtounicode{enc:cmmi/A}{D835 DC34} % UTF16BE required Note that search behavior for math letters varies with pdf viewers. Acrobat implements only canonical equivalence, so you need to enter the exact code point, and copy/paste preserves the code points, so you can paste into a LaTeX document if it's using utf8x input encoding. Evince implements compatibility equivalence, so it's easier to find those math As by searching for plain A, but they also copy/paste as plain A. You can use pdftotext however, which uses the same poppler backend, to have the code points are preserved. I'm not really advocating Unicode math letters, but now they're easily supported in pdftex -- no need for manual CMaps anymore. BTW, \pdfglyphtounicode now really needs to be documented in the manual, so people would stop writing (buggy) CMaps by hand. I volunteer to do it if you accept the patch :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-09-08 08:36 Message: re-open this case, since the "enc" namespace seems useful and would make glyphtounicode.tex simpler. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2009-12-01 22:02 Message: included in 1.40.10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2009-04-07 14:59 Message: this patch is indeed very useful, however adding tfm namespace support is enough since it can cover the other case. I have changed the patch slightly to: - drop the enc: case - use "tfm:" instead of "fnt:" as the tfm namespace prefix And added a small test file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=495&aid=2087&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][896] including an image (pdf or png) with transparency messes up other colours on that page
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 04 Sep '10

04 Sep '10

Bugs item #896, was opened at 2007-12-29 21:00 Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Jim Diamond (zsd) Assigned to: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Summary: including an image (pdf or png) with transparency messes up other colours on that page Category: Image inclusion Group: v1.50.0-alpha Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: Download http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/img_png/stefan_255_rgba.png (which has a transparent background) and run it through png2pdf as follows: png2pdf -i stefan_255_rgba.png stefan_255_rgba-i.pdf png2pdf -a stefan_255_rgba.png stefan_255_rgba-a.pdf png2pdf stefan_255_rgba.png stefan_255_rgba-neither.pdf Then run the following through pdflatex (pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)) \documentclass{beamer} \mode<presentation> { \usetheme{Madrid} \setbeamercovered{transparent} } \usepackage{ifpdf} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{color} \ifpdf \hypersetup{% pdfpagemode=FullScreen, pdfpagetransition={Wipe /Di 0 /D 0.5} } \fi \title[Beamer and png2pdf]{Using png2pdf with the beamer class} \author[Krause]{D.~Krause} \subject{png2pdf} \begin{document} \beamertemplateshadingbackground{yellow!50}{magenta!50} \begin{frame} \frametitle{NO Image over background} This is some text \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{Original stefan... png image over background} \includegraphics{stefan_255_rgba.png}% \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{png2pdf -a stefan... image over background} \includegraphics{stefan_255_rgba-a.pdf}% \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{png2pdf -i stefan... image over background} \includegraphics{stefan_255_rgba-i.pdf}% \end{frame} \begin{frame} \frametitle{png2pdf stefan... over background} \includegraphics{stefan_255_rgba-neither.pdf}% \end{frame} \end{document} Now look at the resulting PDF (attached) with Acroread 7.0.9 or 8.1.1 on Linux. On the page which includes the PNG and also on the page which includes the png2pdf -a version, the other colours on the page are messed up somewhat. This also happens on Acroread 8.? running on Windoze xp under vmware, although it seems a bit less noticeable. There is no apparent problem when looking at the file with xpdf or kpdf (Slackware 12.0 Linux). It's not clear to me whether this is an acroread bug or a pdftex bug, but Martin Schröder suggested I open a bug here. Cheers. Jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yannick B (bers) Date: 2010-09-04 09:38 Message: Hi, I just ran this example through pdfTex 1.40.11 (MiKTeX 2.9 beta). What I found out is that this issue is fixed for the png, but not for the transparent pdf file (png2pdf -a). File: beamer_1.40.11.pdf. You see that the colors on slides 1 and 2 are different. This might need another fix. (I assume it worked once, but was accidently removed in a later revision, perhaps due to what I'll point out now.) I also noted that the bug fix for the png has a very ugly side-effect, which I illustrate by two snapshots (snapshot_original.png, snapshot_1.40.11.png). You clearly see that the white font is more "bold" in the new version; also, you note a white frame around the image, and that the symbols in the lower right corner show some artifacts - especially the circle-arrows. This is a rendering issue in Acrobat on some systems, which has been encountered and described by others already. A minimal example of this effect can for example be found here: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3108003 A reason for this might be the missing inclusion of "blending space" information, as pointed out in the reply to above's post. This same issue has also been described for pdf file inclusion, see here: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4294&group_id=106 In that case, it is based on incomplete page group information of the included pdf. However, as also pointed out in that discussion, a new page group is synthesized for png files, so there needs to be something wrong with that. It is really an annoying bug, as pages with an without transparent pngs in them may look different to your reader. I do not have enough knowledge to assign the different effects to their respective root causes, but I do believe that this bug entry here might be a good starting point. Last question: How do I attach files? I will as soon as I have found out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2008-01-14 17:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 A fix for this will be included in the next release (1.40.6/1.50.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2007-12-31 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 Our contact at adobe confirms that pages with transparent objects on them (like pngs) must have a /Group entry in the /Page object. I'll fix that next year. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2007-12-29 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 This is not related to #764, as there are no page Groups. It also happens only with the png or rgba-a. I'll ask our contact at Adobe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Diamond (zsd) Date: 2007-12-29 22:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=4814 I just d/l'ed and compiled pdftex Version 3.141592-1.40.5 (Web2C 7.5.6) The pdf files (1.40.3 and 1.40.5 versions) are slightly different (when compared as text) but when viewed with acroread 7.0.9 they look identical (as far as my eyes can tell). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Diamond (zsd) Date: 2007-12-29 21:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=4814 Done ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Schröder (oneiros) Date: 2007-12-29 21:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=421 Please attach the pdfs from png2pdf. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=896&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4317] \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Bugs item #4317, was opened at 2010-08-25 13:47 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents Category: Primitives Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: \showlists and \showbox are useful tools for debugging. However the node generated by \pdfstartlink does not show its children. Example for iniTeX or plain TeX: \catcode`\{=1 \catcode`\}=2 \pdfoutput=1 \hsize=100pt \parfillskip=0pt plus 1fil \showboxdepth=1000 \showboxbreadth=1000 \tracingonline=1 \setbox0=\hbox{% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 10pt height 10pt \pdfendlink }\showbox0 \noindent \vrule width 20pt height 20pt \hbox{\vrule width 30pt height 30pt}% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 40pt height 40pt \pdfendlink \par \showlists \end The output does not show the rule for 10pt and 40pt, e.g. > \box0= \hbox(10.0+0.0)x10.0 .\pdfstartlink(*+*)x* action user{} Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-08-26 07:59 Message: many thanks Heiko, patch applied to stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Date: 2010-08-26 03:28 Message: The analysis of the sources revealed that inside the case pdf_start_link_node inside <Display the whatsit...> an errornous `return' occurs, if the action is `user'. The fix replaces the `return' by an else branch for the other action cases. I try to add the patch file right here to avoid the overhead of a new patch item. Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4317&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4317] \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Bugs item #4317, was opened at 2010-08-25 15:47 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents Category: Primitives Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: \showlists and \showbox are useful tools for debugging. However the node generated by \pdfstartlink does not show its children. Example for iniTeX or plain TeX: \catcode`\{=1 \catcode`\}=2 \pdfoutput=1 \hsize=100pt \parfillskip=0pt plus 1fil \showboxdepth=1000 \showboxbreadth=1000 \tracingonline=1 \setbox0=\hbox{% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 10pt height 10pt \pdfendlink }\showbox0 \noindent \vrule width 20pt height 20pt \hbox{\vrule width 30pt height 30pt}% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 40pt height 40pt \pdfendlink \par \showlists \end The output does not show the rule for 10pt and 40pt, e.g. > \box0= \hbox(10.0+0.0)x10.0 .\pdfstartlink(*+*)x* action user{} Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Date: 2010-08-26 05:28 Message: The analysis of the sources revealed that inside the case pdf_start_link_node inside <Display the whatsit...> an errornous `return' occurs, if the action is `user'. The fix replaces the `return' by an else branch for the other action cases. I try to add the patch file right here to avoid the overhead of a new patch item. Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4317&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4317] \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 25 Aug '10

25 Aug '10

Bugs item #4317, was opened at 2010-08-25 13:47 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) >Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents Category: Primitives Group: None >Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: \showlists and \showbox are useful tools for debugging. However the node generated by \pdfstartlink does not show its children. Example for iniTeX or plain TeX: \catcode`\{=1 \catcode`\}=2 \pdfoutput=1 \hsize=100pt \parfillskip=0pt plus 1fil \showboxdepth=1000 \showboxbreadth=1000 \tracingonline=1 \setbox0=\hbox{% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 10pt height 10pt \pdfendlink }\showbox0 \noindent \vrule width 20pt height 20pt \hbox{\vrule width 30pt height 30pt}% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 40pt height 40pt \pdfendlink \par \showlists \end The output does not show the rule for 10pt and 40pt, e.g. > \box0= \hbox(10.0+0.0)x10.0 .\pdfstartlink(*+*)x* action user{} Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4317&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4317] \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 25 Aug '10

25 Aug '10

Bugs item #4317, was opened at 2010-08-25 15:47 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: \pdfstartlink node doesn't show its node contents Category: Primitives Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: \showlists and \showbox are useful tools for debugging. However the node generated by \pdfstartlink does not show its children. Example for iniTeX or plain TeX: \catcode`\{=1 \catcode`\}=2 \pdfoutput=1 \hsize=100pt \parfillskip=0pt plus 1fil \showboxdepth=1000 \showboxbreadth=1000 \tracingonline=1 \setbox0=\hbox{% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 10pt height 10pt \pdfendlink }\showbox0 \noindent \vrule width 20pt height 20pt \hbox{\vrule width 30pt height 30pt}% \pdfstartlink user{}% \vrule width 40pt height 40pt \pdfendlink \par \showlists \end The output does not show the rule for 10pt and 40pt, e.g. > \box0= \hbox(10.0+0.0)x10.0 .\pdfstartlink(*+*)x* action user{} Yours sincerely Heiko ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4317&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4316] glyphtounicode.tex contains wrong entries
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

Bugs item #4316, was opened at 2010-08-02 07:23 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: glyphtounicode.tex contains wrong entries Category: Fonts Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 00:39:36 +0100 (BST) From: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" <cfrees(a)imapmail.org> ... should glyphtounicode.tex be using: {precedesequal}{2AAF} {followsequal}{2AB0} rather than mapping these to 227C and 227D? glyphtounicode.tex seems to disagree with both STIX and fontforge, as well as Hirwen. I think 227C and 227D correspond to characters in AMS MS A: {precedesorcurly}{227C} {followsorcurly}{227D} rather than the characters in OMS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4316&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4315] pdftex manual is not up-to-date
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 30 Jul '10

30 Jul '10

Bugs item #4315, was opened at 2010-07-30 06:49 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: pdftex manual is not up-to-date Category: Documentation Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: The manual needs some correction: \pdfelapsedtime: poor wording \letterspacefont: missing \pdfinclusioncopyfonts: missing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4315&group_id=106

1 0

pdftex-1.40.11
by Thanh Han The 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Hi, pdftex-1.40.11 is available at http://sarovar.org/frs/download.php/1300/pdftex-1.40.11.tar.bz2 This is a maintenance release with mostly bugfixes. ,--------, | - bugfixes: | - ttf2afm reported wrong ItalicAngle for some fonts | - detect/prevent wrong arguments of \pdfsetmatrix [#4301] | - check for pdf nodes in dvi mode | - whitespace should be inserted when concatenating contents stream [#4307] | - pdftex fails to include seemingly good PDF [#4309] | - wrong description of \pdfelapsedtime in manual [#4300] | - \pdfgentounicode conflicts with cmap+\pdffontattr [#4291] | - \rightmarginkern doesn't work for last lines [#4292] | - \pdfximagebbox wrong for PDF files with /Rotate != 0 [#939] | - \leftmarginkern & \rightmarginkern doesn't work with box registers > 255 [#4312] | | - changes: | - pdf inclusion: removed the requirement that named resources must be indirect (#4299) | - added debug messages for pdftex_fail() `--------` Regards, Thanh

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4312] \leftmarginkern & \rightmarginkern doesn't work with box registers > 255
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Bugs item #4312, was opened at 2010-04-30 07:54 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: \leftmarginkern & \rightmarginkern doesn't work with box registers > 255 Category: hz Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: the box should be fetched using fetch_box() macro instead of direct use of box(cur_val). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-07-28 12:40 Message: Fixed in 1.40.11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4312&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4291] \pdfgentounicode conflicts with cmap+\pdffontattr
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Bugs item #4291, was opened at 2009-06-26 22:37 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: \pdfgentounicode conflicts with cmap+\pdffontattr Category: None Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: from https://www.tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2007-October/014986.html > I think there are unsolved issues. Now there are two methods > for adding CMaps: > (a) \pdffontattr, package cmap > (b) \pdfgentounicode, glyphtounicode.tex > > Both methods have its limitations, e.g. (b) only works for Type 1 > fonts. Thus you could need both methods to cover all fonts, but the > methods doesn't know each other, thus fonts can end up with two CMap > tables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-07-28 12:40 Message: Fixed in 1.40.11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-04-16 12:25 Message: a workaround for this problem is available in pdftex stable (1.40.11-beta). A primitive was introduced to disable the tounicode entry generated by \pdfgentounicode if needed. Minimal test file: ,--------, \pdfcompresslevel=0 \input glyphtounicode \pdfgentounicode=1 \font\f=cmb10 \pdfnobuiltintounicode\f Hello, \f world! \bye `--------` ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4291&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4307] whitespace should be inserted when concatenating contents stream
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Bugs item #4307, was opened at 2010-04-10 22:02 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: whitespace should be inserted when concatenating contents stream Category: PDF inclusion Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: http://tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2010-February/008330.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-07-28 12:40 Message: Fixed in 1.40.11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4307&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4306] \pdfelapsedtime returns wrong result in 1.40.10
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Bugs item #4306, was opened at 2010-04-05 09:26 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: \pdfelapsedtime returns wrong result in 1.40.10 Category: Primitives Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: See http://www.tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2009-November/008143.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-07-28 12:40 Message: Fixed in 1.40.11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4306&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4300] wrong description of \pdfelapsedtime in manual
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Bugs item #4300, was opened at 2009-12-23 10:20 >Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: wrong description of \pdfelapsedtime in manual Category: Documentation Group: None >Resolution: Fixed Initial Comment: from http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-pdftex/2009-December/003872.html: ,--------, The manual says (January 25, 2007, Rev. 1.675): | \pdfelapsedtime <read-only integer> | The command expands to a number ... \pdfelapsedtime is a integer register and therefore not expandable. It doesn't expand, it needs the help of \the or \number for `expansion'. `--------` ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-07-28 12:40 Message: Fixed in 1.40.11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4300&group_id=106

1 0