On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:11:53 +0200 h h extern wrote:

I lost all friday's mail so if someone expects an answer from me ...

I have an open question related to the bib module. Not sure if you intended to respond or not, but I'd really like to know of this is a change in ConTeXt that I should intercept for in the module, or a bug created by the low-level language change that needs fixing in your code. Greetings, Taco Taco Hoekwater wrote:

Hi Martin/Adam,

Thank you for investigating this, you have saved me an enormous amount of debugging work, I think.

It is not completely clear to me if I really should change to the module. I could insert a 'criterium=all' as default for the list, but since it suddenly stopped working, it looks like there is a ConTeXt bug involded somewhere. That probably merits investigation as well.

Greetings, Taco

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:52:14 +0200 Martin Kolarik wrote:

...

Yes, I can see my test file :-) -- you should get the list in the test file if you state

\setuppublicationlist [criterium=all]

or

\setuppublicationlist [criterium=section]

for the list of pubs from the current section only.

I succeeded after this,

have a nice day,

Martin

-----Original Message----- From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl]On Behalf Of Adam Lindsay Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:01 PM To: martin@mii.cz; mailing list for ConTeXt users; Taco Hoekwater Subject: Re: [NTG-context] m-bib module

Martin Kolarik said this at Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:14:55 +0200:

...

2. if I used simply \placepublications (or \placelist[pubs]) I got nothing. And after some tracing I found that I did not set criterium=something.

Hum. Thanks for the response, but I tried a minimal file, and it all became clear.

If there's a \section in my test file, \placelist[pubs] and its variants doesn't work. If I take it out, the list appears just fine.

Huh?