debian: itemize start=0
Hi, on debian testing this small file \starttext \startitemize[n] \item one \item two \stopitemize blahblah \startitemize[n,continue] \item three \stopitemize \stoptext gives an itemization that starts at zero, plus the continue does not work either (context version: 2007.09.28 16:52 (/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/context.tex)). Any hints or preliminary solutions greatly appreciated. P.Link
Your example looks OK to me, and we seem to have the same software:
ConTeXt ver: 2007.09.28 16:52 MKII fmt: 2007.10.9 int: english/english
On 10/10/07, plink
Hi,
on debian testing this small file
\starttext
\startitemize[n] \item one \item two \stopitemize
blahblah
\startitemize[n,continue] \item three \stopitemize
\stoptext
gives an itemization that starts at zero, plus the continue does not work either (context version: 2007.09.28 16:52 (/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/context.tex)).
Any hints or preliminary solutions greatly appreciated.
P.Link ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
--
George N. White III
On 10/10/07, plink wrote:
Hi,
on debian testing this small file
\starttext
\startitemize[n] \item one \item two \stopitemize
blahblah
\startitemize[n,continue] \item three \stopitemize
\stoptext
gives an itemization that starts at zero, plus the continue does not work either (context version: 2007.09.28 16:52 (/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/context.tex)).
Any hints or preliminary solutions greatly appreciated.
Don't ask me how that was possible. I tried that example and it works fine. Last time (Thread "nesting \startitemize", 3 days ago) I had those problems as well, but nobody else has complained about it, so I have never mentioned it. Weird. I have no time to test at the moment, but there seem to have been problems with this for some time already. See also: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/36285 Also, in past, people reported many problem with "itemization starts with 0 when in dvi mode". Mojca
participants (3)
-
George N. White III -
Mojca Miklavec -
plink