Am 15.04.2011 um 13:37 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:

2011/4/15 Wolfgang Schuster :

...

...

It compiles under ConTeXt without a problem, but on the wiki I get a texexec error.

The fancybreak is only shipped with the minimals but not with TeXLive which is AFAIR used by the wiki.

How can I only put the code on the wiki?

You can write code for the source and the output where you use fancbreak in the source (already written by you) and for the output you just write “\blank\noindentation” to simulate the \myblank command. Wolfgang

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:25, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Am 15.04.2011 um 08:41 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:

...

It compiles under ConTeXt without a problem, but on the wiki I get a texexec error.

The fancybreak is only shipped with the minimals but not with TeXLive which is AFAIR used by the wiki.

No, wiki is not using TeX Live, but it doesn't contain modules. (I'll fix that on the new machine.) Mojca

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote:

2011/4/15 Mojca Miklavec :

...

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:25, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

...

Am 15.04.2011 um 08:41 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:

...

It compiles under ConTeXt without a problem, but on the wiki I get a texexec error.

The fancybreak is only shipped with the minimals but not with TeXLive which is AFAIR used by the wiki.

No, wiki is not using TeX Live, but it doesn't contain modules. (I'll fix that on the new machine.)

But it uses texexec (MKII) and not context (MKIV)? The results I get are the same as using texexec, not context.

IIRC, there were some security concerns with MkIV: \ctxlua{os.execute("cat /etc/passwd")} Aditya

On 15-4-2011 7:44, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote:

...

2011/4/15 Mojca Miklavec :

...

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:25, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

...

Am 15.04.2011 um 08:41 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:

...

It compiles under ConTeXt without a problem, but on the wiki I get a texexec error.

The fancybreak is only shipped with the minimals but not with TeXLive which is AFAIR used by the wiki.

No, wiki is not using TeX Live, but it doesn't contain modules. (I'll fix that on the new machine.)

But it uses texexec (MKII) and not context (MKIV)? The results I get are the same as using texexec, not context.

IIRC, there were some security concerns with MkIV:

\ctxlua{os.execute("cat /etc/passwd")}

Althoug I admit that I tested it long ago (early days of mkiv) there is some control built in: system.executionmode system.executionlist the mode can be set "none" or "list" an in the later case you need to mention the permitted programs. There are also some options for reading files. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

2011/4/16 Aditya Mahajan :

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote:

...

I started making a page about indent:   http://wiki.contextgarden.net/indent

There is already a page at:

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation

I did not know that.

I added explanation about first, next, odd, even options. I am not sute that the comments about blank and flowchart should go on the page on indentation. I think that they belong on a wiki page on blanks and flowchart respectively.

I think they need to be there, because this where problems I encountered when I wanted to use indentation. ;-} With MKII there is no problem with blanks. -- Cecil Westerhof