Thanks, it works perfectly. On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:

...

Hello,

I'd have one more question.

I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing an external file, but a small example is attached):

\setuphead[subsection][before={\blank[preference,2*big]}]

BTW:

If you name really your files in the same way as your example you should change it because:

• ”t-” is a prefix for a module and

- I'll think about it, but maybe I won't change it until a problem with Ctx appears as I'm used to prefix all test files by "t-"; this concerns also my Cpp, AutoLisp and Lua files and other test files in general.

• the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for proprocessing in xml format).

- OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx extension for Ctx sources. Moreover, till I'm trying to achieve the same things in Ctx as I'm used to do in LaTeX, I may have <a-file>.tex (for LaTeX) and <a-file>.ctx (for ConTeXt) in the same directory. I initially don't know whether I'll succeed with Ctx version (I'm still Ctx beginner and, although many things may be made more easily in Ctx, they work for me in LTX in the moment but still not in Ctx). Lukas

Wolfgang

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:19 +0200, luigi scarso wrote:

...

...

• the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for proprocessing in xml format).

- OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx extension for Ctx sources. Moreover, till I'm trying to achieve the same things in Ctx as I'm used to do in LaTeX, I may have <a-file>.tex (for LaTeX) and <a-file>.ctx (for ConTeXt) in the same directory. I initially don't know whether I'll succeed with Ctx version (I'm still Ctx beginner and, although many things may be made more easily in Ctx, they work for me in LTX in the moment but still not in Ctx). You can also use .mkiv for ConTeXt MKIV

Yes, it sounds better. I noticed .mkiv files in Ctx installation tree but I thought this extension is "reserved" for a kind of files rather than .ctx.

and .tex for LaTeX and ConTeXt MKII

(It allows .mkii for "old style" Ctx as well.) Lukas

On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:

Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with old OS and perhaps MIME questions.

What? You mean DOS? And FAT? Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii... Alan P.S. I am still using some real-time applications running on computers under DOS, but I would not dream of trying to put ConTeXt on such a system!

On 10/12/2010 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:

...

Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with old OS and perhaps MIME questions.

What? You mean DOS? And FAT? Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...

Since the almost total disappearance of 3.5" floppies and bare iso9660 CDs, I do not care about DOS/FAT any more. But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection on extension, so that is something to keep in mind. Best wishes, Taco

On 12-10-2010 12:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:36:26 Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection on extension, so that is something to keep in mind.

Oh, Windows... (written with disdain)

actually I like the filetype / suffix thing even if it's imperfect (and I dislike suffixless filenames as it gives me no clue what I deal with) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------