Is the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) style files for ConTeXt incompatible with \setupinteraction[state=start]?
When I am using the SBL ConTeXt files for citations, if I add a line `\setupinteraction[state=start` my code starts complaining: Undefined control sequence \currentbtxloctext <macro> \16>:btx:sbl:cite:inline #1->\fastsetup {\s!btx :\s!cite :concat}\fastsetup {btx:sbl:cite:lefttext}\begingroup \letbtxparameter {punct}\empty \def \currentbtxcitealternative {inline}\def \currentbtxcategory {\btxfield {category}}\def \currentbtxloctext {\btxparameter {loctex <macro> \normalexpanded \Word {\fastsetup {btx:sbl:cite:inline} }\doif {\btxparameter {righttext}}{\empty } {\btxperiod } <macro> \strc_constructions_register_yes ... Is this package incompatible with interaction? --Joel
On 1/15/23 17:57, Joel via ntg-context wrote:
When I am using the SBL ConTeXt files for citations, if I add a line `\setupinteraction[state=start` my code starts complaining: [...] Is this package incompatible with interaction?
Hi Joel, unless I’m missing your point, https://github.com/jjmccollum/context-sbl/issues/new is the place to report your issue. BTW, I downloaded current master (https://github.com/jjmccollum/context-sbl/archive/refs/heads/main.zip) and the test file compiles just fine with and without \setupinteraction[state=start]. The undefined command from your error message (\currentbtxloctext) seems to be defined in four setups from tex/publ-imp-sbl.mkvi: \def\currentbtxloctext{\btxparameter{loctext}} The setups containing the definitions are btx:sbl:cite:inlinelong, btx:sbl:cite:inlineshort, btx:sbl:cite:inline and btx:sbl:cite:shorthand. Your code might be triggering an unwanted effect and the module developer may fix it. Just in case it might help, Pablo
participants (2)
-
Joel -
Pablo Rodriguez