Cambria: integral sign has wrong size
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it? Julian ---- \usetypescript[cambria] \setupbodyfont[cambria,10pt] \startTEXpage \startformula \prod_a^b \sum_{n=0}^\infty \int_0^\infty e^{-{\bi\beta}^2}\, {\rm d}^3{\bi \beta} \stopformula \stopTEXpage ----
On 06/30/2011 10:46 AM, Julian Becker wrote:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
It is a regression (it was ok with older context versions) but I am not sure what is causing it. The most likely cause is that the metrics patch to CambriaMath is no longer applied, but I do not quite remember how to check that. Best wishes, Taco
In this case, is there a quick workaround? I tried something like redefining
\int
using
\def\int{\getglyph{CambriaMath}{\char"F05C2}\intlimits}
This gives the desired result in displaystyle, but is incompatible with
scriptstyle math. Is there a way to adapt this workaround to account for
this in some way?
Best regards,
Julian
2011/7/1 Taco Hoekwater
On 06/30/2011 10:46 AM, Julian Becker wrote:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
It is a regression (it was ok with older context versions) but I am not sure what is causing it. The most likely cause is that the metrics patch to CambriaMath is no longer applied, but I do not quite remember how to check that.
Best wishes, Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
Try setting \Umathoperatorsize\displaystyle=2em or so until you find a suitable value. On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:25:27AM +0200, Julian Becker wrote:
In this case, is there a quick workaround? I tried something like redefining \ int using \def\int{\getglyph{CambriaMath}{\char"F05C2}\intlimits}
This gives the desired result in displaystyle, but is incompatible with scriptstyle math. Is there a way to adapt this workaround to account for this in some way?
Best regards, Julian
2011/7/1 Taco Hoekwater
On 06/30/2011 10:46 AM, Julian Becker wrote:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
It is a regression (it was ok with older context versions) but I am not sure what is causing it. The most likely cause is that the metrics patch to CambriaMath is no longer applied, but I do not quite remember how to check that.
Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Khaled Hosny Egyptian Arab
Thanks Khaled,
this works like a charm!
Best wishes,
Julian
2011/7/1 Khaled Hosny
Try setting \Umathoperatorsize\displaystyle=2em or so until you find a suitable value.
In this case, is there a quick workaround? I tried something like redefining \ int using \def\int{\getglyph{CambriaMath}{\char"F05C2}\intlimits}
This gives the desired result in displaystyle, but is incompatible with scriptstyle math. Is there a way to adapt this workaround to account for
in some way?
Best regards, Julian
2011/7/1 Taco Hoekwater
On 06/30/2011 10:46 AM, Julian Becker wrote:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:25:27AM +0200, Julian Becker wrote: this pdf.
Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how
to fix
it?
It is a regression (it was ok with older context versions) but I am
not
sure what is causing it. The most likely cause is that the metrics patch to CambriaMath is no longer applied, but I do not quite
remember
how to check that.
Best wishes, Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
___________________________________________________________________________________ the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Khaled Hosny Egyptian Arab
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
Am 20:59, schrieb Julian Becker:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
Julian
---- \usetypescript[cambria] \setupbodyfont[cambria,10pt]
\startTEXpage \startformula \prod_a^b \sum_{n=0}^\infty \int_0^\infty e^{-{\bi\beta}^2}\, {\rm d}^3{\bi \beta} \stopformula \stopTEXpage ----
This is a known bug in the Cambria font, the size of the big operators is not set correctly, but AFAIK ConTeXt already accounts for this by applying a custom font patch.
On 30-6-2011 10:46, Julian Becker wrote:
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
It will be fixed in the next beta, in the meantime you can replace cambria-math.lfg by this: local function FixDisplayOperatorMinHeight(value,target,original) local o = original.mathparameters.DisplayOperatorMinHeight if o < 2800 then return 2800 * target.parameters.factor else return value -- already scaled end end return { name = "cambria-math", version = "1.00", comment = "Goodies that complement cambria.", author = "Hans Hagen", copyright = "ConTeXt development team", mathematics = { parameters = { DisplayOperatorMinHeight = FixDisplayOperatorMinHeight, } } } ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello all,
It was the same in the Charter,Utopia and Garamond.
--
Best regards,
Huang Ze
2011/6/30 Julian Becker
Hello everybody! I tried doing some math typesetting with Cambria, but somehow the integral sign comes out somewhat smaller than it should be. Running the following in the latest beta produces the attached pdf. Does anybody have an idea about what's going wrong here, or how to fix it?
Julian
---- \usetypescript[cambria] \setupbodyfont[cambria,10pt]
\startTEXpage \startformula \prod_a^b \sum_{n=0}^\infty \int_0^\infty e^{-{\bi\beta}^2}\, {\rm d}^3{\bi \beta} \stopformula \stopTEXpage ----
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
participants (6)
-
Hans Hagen -
Julian Becker -
Khaled Hosny -
Philipp Stephani -
Taco Hoekwater -
views63