Hi, re: http://source.contextgarden.net/symb-uni.tex What does, for example, "0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20" mean in \startsymbolset[Unicode Additional Punctuation] % 0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20 in the context of \usesymbols[uni] \def\mySymbol{\symbol[Unicode Additional Punctuation][*symbolname*]} Thanks, Alan
Alan Stone wrote:
Hi,
re: http://source.contextgarden.net/symb-uni.tex
What does, for example,
"0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20" mean in \startsymbolset[Unicode Additional Punctuation] % 0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20
in the context of
\usesymbols[uni] \def\mySymbol{\symbol[Unicode Additional Punctuation][*symbolname*]}
this system is based on big ttf files split into pfb ranges where 20 indicates a range (so, the font with symbolicname UnicodeRegular might have many split fonts) a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
this system is ... a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv
Excuse me my ignorance...
What mkiv feature/mechanism replaces the obsolete one ?
Best,
Alan
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Hans Hagen
Alan Stone wrote:
Hi,
re: http://source.contextgarden.net/symb-uni.tex
What does, for example,
"0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20" mean in \startsymbolset[Unicode Additional Punctuation] % 0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20
in the context of
\usesymbols[uni] \def\mySymbol{\symbol[Unicode Additional Punctuation][*symbolname*]}
this system is based on big ttf files split into pfb ranges where 20 indicates a range (so, the font with symbolicname UnicodeRegular might have many split fonts)
a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv
Hans
Alan Stone wrote:
this system is ... a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv
Excuse me my ignorance...
What mkiv feature/mechanism replaces the obsolete one ?
named glyph access but so far i had no time to make dedicated symb files for that Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Hans. So back to "the old days"...
What additional instruction(s) are required to satisfy the condition of, for
example "0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20" ?
--
Best,
Alan
* using ConTeXt ver: 2008.08.18 14:00 MKIV fmt: 2008.8.22 int:
english/english (on Windows XP)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Hans Hagen
Alan Stone wrote:
this system is ... a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv
Excuse me my ignorance...
What mkiv feature/mechanism replaces the obsolete one ?
named glyph access but so far i had no time to make dedicated symb files for that
Hans
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Alan Stone wrote:
Ok Hans. So back to "the old days"...
What additional instruction(s) are required to satisfy the condition of, for example "0x2000: Requires UnicodeRegular20" ?
Most probably you need to create you own font files (tfm, enc, map files, ...) Here's a gentle introduction of how to deal with font files. Not exactly all aspects of it apply (some LaTeX specific files can be omitted, but everything about tfm, enc, map ... files still applies, and you also need to make sure that otf2tfm conversion works), but ask if you will [still] have any questions after reading it: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/Type1fonts/fontinstallationguide/ (I have an impression that some appedix of LaTeX companion was freely available on web, covering the same topic, but I'm probably wrong.) Mojca PS: my advice: use LuaTeX or XeTeX and type that character in Unicode
* using ConTeXt ver: 2008.08.18 14:00 MKIV fmt: 2008.8.22 int: english/english (on Windows XP)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: Alan Stone wrote:
this system is ... a kind of obsolete mechanism now that we have mkiv
Excuse me my ignorance...
What mkiv feature/mechanism replaces the obsolete one ?
named glyph access but so far i had no time to make dedicated symb files for that
Hans
participants (3)
-
Alan Stone
-
Hans Hagen
-
Mojca Miklavec