Hi, I uploaded a beta. There have been quite some changes in the lua code, not so much in terms of functionality but in organization (a first step to a more formal api). So, if you use calls to functions in mkiv, you might need to check it. There have been some extensions but those will become available when the next luatex release happens. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 3 sept. 2010, at 11:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a beta. There have been quite some changes in the lua code, not so much in terms of functionality but in organization (a first step to a more formal api). So, if you use calls to functions in mkiv, you might need to check it.
There have been some extensions but those will become available when the next luatex release happens.
Hans
Dear Hans, dear Mojca, In order to test the new release, I just updated to the new beta through the minimals, but after that I get still the same ConTeXt version, that is ConTeXt version 2010.08.20 00:00 LuaTeX version 62, LuaTeX revision 0, (LuaTeX date stamp 2010081520). Since we had such a weird behavior sometime ago, I wonder whether something is going wrong with the updating procedure. This said, I am very happy with the version I haveā¦ I wanted just to let you know about a possible issue: there is no complain at all! With my best regards: OK
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 16:41, Otared Kavian
Dear Hans, dear Mojca,
In order to test the new release, I just updated to the new beta through the minimals, but after that I get still the same ConTeXt version, that is ConTeXt version 2010.08.20 00:00
The same here (WinXP).
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen
-
Otared Kavian
-
Vnpenguin