Dear all, Updating context (linux-64) gives: texlua: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by texlua) The 32bit version works fine with glibc2.6. Regards, Bernard
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
bbvogel@home.nl wrote:
Dear all,
Updating context (linux-64) gives:
texlua: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by texlua)
This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
Thanks. 3 months after release and Debian Lenny is already too old. Compiling luatex myself and updating minimals, does that work?
___________________________________________________________________________ ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________ ________
bbvogel@home.nl wrote:
This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
Thanks.
3 months after release and Debian Lenny is already too old.
If it was any other distro I would be surprised ;) Lenny is glibc 2.7, right?
Compiling luatex myself and updating minimals, does that work?
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals. Best wishes, Taco
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals.
Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN, you can even submit the binaries to the repository yourself. Write to Mojca and me if you want an account on the server. Arthur
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 17:21, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals.
Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN, you can even submit the binaries to the repository yourself. Write to Mojca and me if you want an account on the server.
Sorry, my fault, I figured out that I may not compile the binaries on the garden any more (I didn't know that before). Usually Peter compiles all the binaries, this time I did and that has apparently been a mistake. Sorry. Peter, may I ask you to recompile the luatex beta binary (in src/luatex) and commit it to current/luatex-0.40.1/luatex? Thanks, Mojca
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Peter, may I ask you to recompile the luatex beta binary (in src/luatex) and commit it to current/luatex-0.40.1/luatex?
Of course. Compilation has just been started. Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals.
Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN, you can even submit the binaries to the repository yourself. Write to Mojca and me if you want an account on the server.
Lets try compiling first ;) The correct link on luatex.org is still http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex ? ... and is currently down?
Arthur ___________________________________________________________________________ ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________ ________
bbvogel@home.nl wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals. Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN, you can even submit the binaries to the repository yourself. Write to Mojca and me if you want an account on the server.
Lets try compiling first ;)
The correct link on luatex.org is still http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex ?
... and is currently down?
Oh, yes: foundry.supelec.fr is being upgraded today, it should be back on line tomorrow morning. Sorry, I forgot to mention that. Best wishes, Taco
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
bbvogel@home.nl wrote:
This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
Thanks.
3 months after release and Debian Lenny is already too old.
If it was any other distro I would be surprised ;) Lenny is glibc 2.7, right?
Right
Compiling luatex myself and updating minimals, does that work?
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current binary in minimals.
In that case a clean chroot environment might be handy. Lets see what I can do.
Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________ ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________ ________
participants (5)
-
Arthur Reutenauer -
bbvogel＠home.nl -
Mojca Miklavec -
Peter Münster -
Taco Hoekwater