Dolly's Underware ?
Hi Hans, with todays beta I just re-ran Vedran's posted minimal example (see below): Still there is "Underware" laying around under "d". Whom does it belong to? Hans, please fix this bug fast! In my current book there is a truckload of ownerless "underware" laying around :o) Steffen ------- My \index{dog}dog is a \index{dog+bullterrier}bullterrier named \seeindex{Dolly}{Underware}Dolly. He doesn't like \index{cat}cats. There are a lot of \index{cat+stray}stray cats, but only a few of them are \index{cat+Siamese}Siamese. \placeindex
On 28-3-2011 6:18, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Hans,
with todays beta I just re-ran Vedran's posted minimal example (see below):
Still there is "Underware" laying around under "d". Whom does it belong to?
Hans, please fix this bug fast! In my current book there is a truckload of ownerless "underware" laying around :o)
Steffen
-------
My \index{dog}dog is a \index{dog+bullterrier}bullterrier named \seeindex{Dolly}{Underware}Dolly. He doesn't like \index{cat}cats. There are a lot of \index{cat+stray}stray cats, but only a few of them are \index{cat+Siamese}Siamese.
\placeindex
shouldn't there be a \index{Dolly} somewhere? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Am 28.03.2011 um 19:03 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 28-3-2011 6:18, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Hans,
with todays beta I just re-ran Vedran's posted minimal example (see below):
Still there is "Underware" laying around under "d". Whom does it belong to?
Hans, please fix this bug fast! In my current book there is a truckload of ownerless "underware" laying around :o)
Steffen
-------
My \index{dog}dog is a \index{dog+bullterrier}bullterrier named \seeindex{Dolly}{Underware}Dolly. He doesn't like \index{cat}cats. There are a lot of \index{cat+stray}stray cats, but only a few of them are \index{cat+Siamese}Siamese.
\placeindex
shouldn't there be a \index{Dolly} somewhere?
No, not necessarily. Just run the same file (see below) with MkII: Dolly with "Underware", fine. Or did you change the etiquette recently? I mean, did you state in MkIV that nobody shall throw around underwear and disappear ... Steffen ------- \starttext My \index{dog}dog is a \index{dog+bullterrier}bullterrier named \seeindex{Dolly}{Underware}Dolly. He doesn't like \index{cat}cats. There are a lot of \index{cat+stray}stray cats, but only a few of them are \index{cat+Siamese}Siamese. \placeindex \stoptext
On 28-3-2011 8:07, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
No, not necessarily. Just run the same file (see below) with MkII: Dolly with "Underware", fine.
well, mkii is not a reference for this and mkiv shres no register code with it; also, you can consider the fact that mkii does not ignore faulty entries a bug there
I mean, did you state in MkIV that nobody shall throw around underwear and disappear ...
not only underware will disappear anyhow, i now issue a message so when you see them you'd better check your source because your pant might drop to your ankles showing your underware when your client tell you that he wonders where those entries pointing nowhere come from (ok, you can consider it part of the "automatically generate random references and bibliographies" feature that Thomas and I are working on) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
2011/3/28 Hans Hagen
On 28-3-2011 8:07, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
No, not necessarily. Just run the same file (see below) with MkII: Dolly
with "Underware", fine.
well, mkii is not a reference for this and mkiv shres no register code with it; also, you can consider the fact that mkii does not ignore faulty entries a bug there
In that case we should probably fix the wiki example. Hans, will you consider adding ?? or something to signify broken entries? Regards, Vedran
Am 28.03.2011 um 21:26 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 28-3-2011 8:07, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
No, not necessarily. Just run the same file (see below) with MkII: Dolly with "Underware", fine.
well, mkii is not a reference for this and mkiv shres no register code with it; also, you can consider the fact that mkii does not ignore faulty entries a bug there
I mean, did you state in MkIV that nobody shall throw around underwear and disappear ...
not only underware will disappear
anyhow, i now issue a message so when you see them you'd better check your source because your pant might drop to your ankles showing your underware when your client tell you that he wonders where those entries pointing nowhere come from (ok, you can consider it part of the "automatically generate random references and bibliographies" feature that Thomas and I are working on)
:o)) Wonderful! Steffen
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Steffen Wolfrum -
Vedran Miletić