Re: [NTG-context] closesymbol on same line as displayed formula
Hi, I am sorry to bring up old topic “Re: closesymbol on same line as displayed formula” again. (ntg-context Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40) Is there any progress after that? It seems to me that there is no more discussions about it. The same thing happens after the itemization as in the following MWE. Thank you for reading. Best regards, Dalyoung \defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.] \setupenumeration[proof] [number=no, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square}, closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi] \starttext \startproof This is a simple proof. \stopproof \startproof This is another simple proof that ends with a formula \startformula 1+1=2. \stopformula \stopproof \startproof \startitemize[n] \item first line. \item second line \stopitemize \stopproof \stoptext
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
The same thing happens after the itemization as in the following MWE.
\defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.]
\setupenumeration[proof] [number=no, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square}, closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
\starttext \startproof This is a simple proof. \stopproof
\startproof This is another simple proof that ends with a formula \startformula 1+1=2. \stopformula \stopproof \startproof \startitemize[n] \item first line. \item second line
Add: \placeclosesymbol here
\stopitemize \stopproof
\stoptext
For display equations, there is not easy solution. (What should happen if there is an equation number; what should happen if the display equation overflows hsize, etc.). The latex package `ntheorem` implements a two pass solution (measures where the equation number box gets placed, and then add the close symbol below it). I am not sure how easy it is to implement such an approach in ConTeXt. Aditya
participants (2)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Jeong Dal