running headers on postponed makeup
Hi all, after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of. ···8<···························································· \definemakeup[my] \setupmakeup[my][ headerstate=start, page=yes, ] \startbuffer[mkup] \startmymakeup \vfill\externalfigure[cow][width=\hsize]\vfill \stopmymakeup \stopbuffer \setuppagenumbering[alternative=doublesided,location=footer] \setupheadertexts [{\getmarking[section]}] [outer] [outer] [{\getmarking[section]}] \starttext \startpostponing[+2] \getbuffer[mkup] \stoppostponing \dorecurse{10}{\section{the Don spake} \input knuth } \stoptext ···8<···························································· Is there way to get the running header on the makeup page? Tweaking the “headerstate” does not seem to have an effect on this. Thanks in advance, Philipp -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote:
after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of.
The next beta will have changes mark behaviour: no reset in everyforget cases, and a fix for pages with no text. The first case is experimental as I cannot foresee unwanted side effects where a reset *is* expected so that might be reverted and done differently. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-12-18 <21:06:11>, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote:
after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of.
The next beta will have changes mark behaviour: no reset in everyforget cases, and a fix for pages with no text. The first case is experimental as I cannot foresee unwanted side effects where a reset *is* expected so that might be reverted and done differently.
Hi Hans, this is great news and comes right in time. So far no side effects occured. Btw. what are those “systemattributes” for? Is attr-ini.mkiv still as “experimental” as it claims? Thanks for the fix, Philipp
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
On 19-12-2010 11:31, Philipp Gesang wrote:
On 2010-12-18<21:06:11>, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 18-12-2010 6:12, Philipp Gesang wrote:
after discovering postponed insertions I encountered a problem when combining it with the makeup mechanism I am so fond of.
The next beta will have changes mark behaviour: no reset in everyforget cases, and a fix for pages with no text. The first case is experimental as I cannot foresee unwanted side effects where a reset *is* expected so that might be reverted and done differently.
Hi Hans,
this is great news and comes right in time. So far no side effects occured.
Btw. what are those “systemattributes” for? Is attr-ini.mkiv
attributes that are used at the tex and lua end so some precautions are taken to prevent redefinition; they are not meant to be touched by users
still as “experimental” as it claims?
not that experimental but who knows what drastic changes we're going to make to luatex before it's 1.0 Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Philipp Gesang