1/ Do you mean luatools --generate should be run whenever you add something to the distro?

Yes. It's the equivalent to mktexlsr for Mark IV.

I ran it on install, but now when I try again:

20:01 jean@boldair /home/jean/lua % luatools --generate

LuaTools | skipping /texmf-local/web2c/texmf.cnf LuaTools | skipping /texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf LuaTools | LuaTools | runtime: 0.013 seconds

This looks like TEXMFCNF is incorrectly set. Anyway, it means that the luatools run was unsuccessful (it generated cache data for the non-existing texmf trees /texmf-local and /texmf).

2/ The problem with additional module is that pdftex or xetex don't find them anymore than luatex does.

Then I don't know. But check TEXMFCNF and run again. Arthur

Le 22 janvier à 20:14:42 "Mojca Miklavec" écrit notamment: | Did you run | . setuptex | ? I had not when first posting, but now I did, then mktexlsr and nothing changed with my added modules. -- Jean

Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run source setuptex.

Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has correctly been sourced by checking that CTXMINIMAL is set (echo $CTXMINIMAL). Arthur

On Jan 23, 2008 7:11 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:

Le 22 janvier à 23:24:31 Arthur Reutenauer écrit notamment:

| > Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run | > source setuptex.

...

| Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has | correctly been sourced by checking that CTXMINIMAL is set (echo $CTXMINIMAL).

...

| Arthur

Shell problem actually! I use zsh, and ". setuptex" produces this: .: aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type: setuptex

while ". ./setuptex" or just "./setuptex" produces: Setting "/home/jean/lua/context/tex" as TEXROOT.

Yes, but the variables are set only locally then. Perhaps I will try to detect that and warn the user. What about source setuptex ? Another alternative is to set these variables in the file where you initialize the shell.

./setuptex:149: unmatched "

What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a shell problem?

If I switch to bash and ". setuptex" : "echo $CTXMINIMAL" says "yes", but after a mktexlsr or texhash my module is still not found :-(

Upercase or lowercase names? Mojca

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:

...

...

./setuptex:149: unmatched "

What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a shell problem?

Yes, this is a bug. I can't reproduce it here, maybe we should take it offline.

I can reproduce it here. In zsh, both . ./setuptex and source setuptex give this error message. Aditya

Le 23 janvier à 11:53:33 "Mojca Miklavec" écrit notamment: | On Jan 23, 2008 7:11 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: | > Le 22 janvier à 23:24:31 Arthur Reutenauer écrit notamment: | > | > | > Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run | > | > source setuptex. | > > | > | Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has | > | correctly been sourced by checking that CTXMINIMAL is set (echo $CTXMINIMAL). | > > | > | Arthur | > | > Shell problem actually! I use zsh, and ". setuptex" produces this: | > .: aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type: setuptex | > | > while ". ./setuptex" or just "./setuptex" produces: | > Setting "/home/jean/lua/context/tex" as TEXROOT.

| Yes, but the variables are set only locally then. Perhaps I will try | to detect that and warn the user. | What about | source setuptex | ? Same result as with ./setuptex

| Another alternative is to set these variables in the file where you | initialize the shell.

| > ./setuptex:149: unmatched "

| What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a | shell problem? I don't know; there is an even number of "s... |

| > If I switch to bash and ". setuptex" : "echo $CTXMINIMAL" says "yes", but | > after a mktexlsr or texhash my module is still not found :-(

| Upercase or lowercase names?

lowercase only; the name is t-lettregreqam.tex Another strange thing: While making various tries with bash, and after running ". setuptex", I issue "texexec --luatex ellaprxth.tex" (a command which works correctly under zsh), and: ............................................ jean@boldair ~/Courrier $ texexec --luatex ellaprxth.tex TeXExec | processing document 'ellaprxth.tex' TeXExec | no ctx file found TeXExec | tex processing method: context TeXExec | TeX run 1 TeXExec | writing option file ellaprxth.top TeXExec | using randomseed 976 TeXExec | tex engine: luatex TeXExec | tex format: cont-en LuaTools | using format name ///home/jean/lua/context/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/c7c52d9874e699048b02283f57cde698/formats/cont-en.fmt LuaTools | no luc/lua with name ///home/jean/lua/context/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/c7c52d9874e699048b02283f57cde698/formats/cont-en LuaTools | LuaTools | runtime: 0.053 seconds TeXUtil | parsing file ellaprxth.tui TeXUtil | check loading of file 'ellaprxth', begin/end problem TeXUtil | shortcuts : 0 TeXUtil | expansions: 0 TeXUtil | reductions: 0 TeXUtil | divisions : 0 TeXUtil | loaded files: 1 TeXUtil | temporary files: 0 TeXUtil | commands: 2 TeXUtil | programs: 0 TeXUtil | tuo file saved TeXExec | runtime: 0.463993 ......................................... Is the installation with minimals linked to a shell?? This is strange since for the installation I remember using "sh first-setup.sh" (ie not zsh) cheers, -- Jean

Le 23 janvier à 13:39:57 Arthur Reutenauer écrit notamment: | > I don't know; there is an even number of "s...

| As Taco said, this looks some file names may have been incorrectly | escaped, but I don't see any suspicious name in your case.

| > Is the installation with minimals linked to a shell??

| Of course not; this is some other bug. Here is some more astonishment (for me at least): I decided to make a minimal installation using bash instead of my default shell zsh, in another location of my home dir. Everything goes well, except that my module in tex/texmf-extra, after mktexlsr, is still not found. And this installation fails if I try to use it *under zsh*, which is symmetric to what I described before. -- Jean

Hi, Is there a way in ConTeXt to define new math operators as with \DeclareMathOperators of AMSlatex? Thanks for your answers, Morgan

Selon Taco Hoekwater :

morgan.brassel@free.fr wrote:

...

Hi,

Is there a way in ConTeXt to define new math operators as with \DeclareMathOperators of AMSlatex?

If I understand correctly, you want to use this command:

\definemathcommand [det] [limop] {\mfunction{det}}

Best wishes, Taco

Yes, precisely. Thank you! And sorry I didn't see the page on the wiki earlier.

___________________________________________________________________________________

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

___________________________________________________________________________________

Hi, We had similar problems with indenting after floats (figures and tables) and after headings. Paragraphs after these kind of objects seem to refuse indenting. We tried several options including "always" or "next" with the \setupindenting and \indenting commands. Is there any possibility to indent paragraphs after floats, headings and equations? Looking forward to hearing from you. Kind regards, Dietrich Rordorf Business Development MDPI Publishing -- MDPI Center Matthaeusstrasse 11 CH - 4057 Basel Switzerland E-Mail: rordorf@mdpi.org Tel: +41 76 561 41 83 (mobile) Tel: +41 61 683 77 34 (office) Fax: +41 61 302 89 18 Quoting morgan.brassel@free.fr:

Hi,

It seems that a paragraph after a formula never gets indented, even with the option \setupindenting[yes,medium]. Is it a feature or a bug? Look at the following example:

\setupindenting[yes,medium] \starttext Indented OK \startformula x = 0. \stopformula

Not indented = bug?

Indented OK \stoptext

Thanks for your answers, Morgan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Selon Taco Hoekwater :

rordorf@mdpi.org wrote:

...

Hi,

We had similar problems with indenting after floats (figures and tables) and after headings. Paragraphs after these kind of objects seem to refuse indenting. We tried several options including "always" or "next" with the \setupindenting and \indenting commands. Is there any possibility to indent paragraphs after floats, headings and equations?

The most important of the block commands accept an indentnext key, for example:

\setuptyping [indentnext=yes] \setupitemize [each] [indentnext=yes] \setupfloats [table] [indentnext=yes] \setupformulas [indentnext=yes] \setuphead [section] [indentnext=yes]

Best wishes, Taco

Thank you. In this case, it would be great to have an option in \setupindenting that enables all of these in one time. By the way, shouldn't it be the role of the 'always' option? It would make sense... Best regards, Morgan