Re: [NTG-context] Newbie question: math font and bibliography
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:55:57 +0100 From: Taco Hoekwater
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Newbie question: math font and bibliography To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Message-ID: <45CC290D.3030105@elvenkind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Zulkifli Hidayat wrote:
For bibliography, I don't have any idea how to cite a bibliography item in the list of publications. I found the wiki is not clear enough for real newbie like me.
The easiest way to explain this is to point you to the manual of the bibliography module. It is on the modules section of the wiki:
http://dl.contextgarden.net/modules/t-bib/doc/context/bib/bibmod-doc.pdf
But it should also be on your harddisk already, in:
<context-texmf-local-tree>/doc/context/bib/bibmod-doc.pdf
If you can't figure out what to do from the manual, you will need to give a bit more information on what precisely is unclear (I know it is probably hard that to expres that clearly, but ...)
Best wishes,
Taco
Dear Taco, I'm sorry if made myself not clear and for the noise about the upright and italic bold math. I found that it works.
I have reread the bibliography manual, I think it should be clear enough for me to do some experiments. But there's one thing makes me confuse, how to cite the publications. From all of the publication fields, which one should I use in \cite[1(opt)][2(reference)]? The first bracket is optional, how about the second one?
One more thing, for the test file above, I can't get uppercase greeks appear right and their bold version as well. I tried it in context live. Is there any suggestion for this?
Thank you
Regards,
Zulkifli
I use the 12.01.2003 version and then the font appears as expected. I apologize for my dumb questions. Best, Zulkifli
Zulkifli Hidayat wrote:
Dear Taco, I'm sorry if made myself not clear and for the noise about the upright and italic bold math. I found that it works.
I have reread the bibliography manual, I think it should be clear enough for me to do some experiments. But there's one thing makes me confuse, how to cite the publications. From all of the publication fields, which one should I use in \cite[1(opt)][2(reference)]? The first bracket is optional, how about the second one?
The simplest solution is to decide on a global style \setuppublications[alternative=apa] % this is actually the default other possible values are aps, ams, num, and ssa. Then you can just use \cite[key] and the style will decide what field to pick.
I apologize for my dumb questions.
There is definately no need to apologise. Cheers, Taco
participants (2)
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Zulkifli Hidayat