![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ac3fbaf0a287c4cffbc9f18fa931586c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The ConTeXt standalone is broken, running first-setup.sh (amd64-freebsd): /usr/local/context/beta/bin/texlua: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" Alan
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, luigi scarso
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Alan BRASLAU
wrote: The ConTeXt standalone is broken, running first-setup.sh (amd64-freebsd):
/usr/local/context/beta/bin/texlua: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" checking...
Linux luigicasa-K55VD 3.5.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 13 17:48:01 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux is ok -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 12/13/2012 10:55 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
The ConTeXt standalone is broken, running first-setup.sh (amd64-freebsd):
/usr/local/context/beta/bin/texlua: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale"
From the internet, I can deduce that this means that the runtime libc does not match the compile time libc. In particular, this seems relevant: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports/105182 Best wishes, Taco
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ac3fbaf0a287c4cffbc9f18fa931586c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:20:49 +0100
Taco Hoekwater
On 12/13/2012 10:55 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
The ConTeXt standalone is broken, running first-setup.sh (amd64-freebsd):
/usr/local/context/beta/bin/texlua: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale"
From the internet, I can deduce that this means that the runtime libc does not match the compile time libc.
In particular, this seems relevant:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports/105182
Best wishes, Taco
Yes, I forced a recompile locally (I am running 9.0, Mojca must have compiled on 9.1) and then modified first-setup.sh NOT to re-sync luatex from the standalone server and the update then succeeded. Strangely, the binary on the server worked yesterday. However, since then, an update of the ports updated pcre, notably, and this requires a recompile of many binaries. I suspect that this is the problem. On TeXlive, many precautions are taken to produce "universal" binaries (i.e. freebsd 7.2) Alan
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:20:49 +0100 Taco Hoekwater
wrote: On 12/13/2012 10:55 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
The ConTeXt standalone is broken, running first-setup.sh (amd64-freebsd):
/usr/local/context/beta/bin/texlua: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale"
From the internet, I can deduce that this means that the runtime libc does not match the compile time libc.
In particular, this seems relevant:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports/105182
Best wishes, Taco
Yes, I forced a recompile locally (I am running 9.0, Mojca must have compiled on 9.1)
True. FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE
and then modified first-setup.sh NOT to re-sync luatex from the standalone server and the update then succeeded.
Strangely, the binary on the server worked yesterday. However, since then, an update of the ports updated pcre, notably, and this requires a recompile of many binaries. I suspect that this is the problem.
Interesting.
On TeXlive, many precautions are taken to produce "universal" binaries (i.e. freebsd 7.2)
But on the other hand, TeX Live has a much wider audience than ConTeXt does. I should check the logs, but I don't recall seeing that many users on (k)freebsd, and the ones who have it, use a recent version. I happily leave compilation of FreeBSD to you if my binaries don't work ;) Mojca
participants (4)
-
Alan BRASLAU
-
luigi scarso
-
Mojca Miklavec
-
Taco Hoekwater