Hans Hagen wrote:

� wrote:

...

I've upgraded to the most recent version of ConTeXt now. I try to set Norwegian hyphenation by saying

\language[no] \setuplanguage[no]

however, as opposed to in the previous version, there are no hyphenations at all. I wonder if it is to do with the pattern file used � how do I set that? and how can I make sure that the correct patterns are used?

Did you uncomment this line in cont-usr.tex: % \installlanguage [\s!no] [\c!state=\v!start] % norwegian ? Best, Taco

� wrote:

On 3. jan. 2007, at 9:41, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

Did you uncomment this line in cont-usr.tex:

% \installlanguage [\s!no] [\c!state=\v!start] % norwegian

?

yes.

I've tried with showhyphens, and it seems that certain tricky words are hyphenated correctly. however, ConTeXt no longer hyphenates �psykolog�, and �psykometriker� is hyphenated as psykometrik-er.

that's why i asked ... what encoding are those files in (i assume ec but if not, we need to correct for that (grep ctxtools for 'no')) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

� wrote:

On 3. jan. 2007, at 1:16, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

that's why i asked ... what encoding are those files in (i assume ec but if not, we need to correct for that (grep ctxtools for 'no'))

oh. the documents are utf-8, whereas the font encoding I use is texnansi.

input encoding and font encoding are indepedent -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

� wrote:

On 3. jan. 2007, at 2:32, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

� wrote:

...

On 3. jan. 2007, at 1:16, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

that's why i asked ... what encoding are those files in (i assume ec but if not, we need to correct for that (grep ctxtools for 'no'))

oh. the documents are utf-8, whereas the font encoding I use is texnansi.

input encoding and font encoding are indepedent

I would know, being the one who talked Tom Rokicki into adding support for font encoding vectors to dvips.

the hyphenation files that context uses are either in a neutral (verbose format) or in utf format (standard now) so the question is ... what encoding are the original nohyph* files in Hans -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On 1/3/07, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

the hyphenation files that context uses are either in a neutral (verbose format) or in utf format (standard now) so the question is ... what encoding are the original nohyph* files in

I don't know anything about the language itself, but it seems to me that the encoding doesn't matter. All the special letters used in that file are the same in both ec and texnansi (from the first sight).

in that case ctxtools --pat --utf no should generate the right ones Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------