Hi Hans, I noticed that recently a discrepancy in the way the prime is positioned in the presence of an index as in $f'_n$ or $f_n'$ (please see the attached PDF). However the positioning is correct in expressions such as $u^k_n$. The problem shows up only in mkiv, and as far as I can say the differnece between the results in mkii and mkiv appeared recently (unfortunately I can't say when…). %%%% begin minimal-example.tex \starttext \startbuffer[math] If for $n \geq 1$ we consider $f_{n} : {\Bbb R} \longrightarrow {\Bbb R}$ a real valued function, and $u_{n} : {\Bbb Z} \longrightarrow {\Bbb Z}$ then we denote \startformula f'_{n}(x) := \lim_{h\to 0}{f_{n}(x + h) - f_{n}(x) \over h}\qquad\mbox{and}\quad u^k_{n} := u_{n}(k) \stopformula \stopbuffer \getbuffer[math] \switchtobodyfont[times] \getbuffer[math] \switchtobodyfont[palatino] \getbuffer[math] \stoptext %%%% end minimal-example.tex
On 9/16/2013 2:29 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I noticed that recently a discrepancy in the way the prime is positioned in the presence of an index as in $f'_n$ or $f_n'$ (please see the attached PDF). However the positioning is correct in expressions such as $u^k_n$. The problem shows up only in mkiv, and as far as I can say the differnece between the results in mkii and mkiv appeared recently (unfortunately I can't say when…).
something got lost when cleaning up the code ... fixed (but we have smaller primes .. i'll make a large option one day but rather wait till there is a trivial extension to luatex (that i need to discuss with taco) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Hans: I did some testing with several fonts and situations, and everything is perfect.
Best regards: OK
On 17 sept. 2013, at 14:58, Hans Hagen
On 9/16/2013 2:29 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I noticed that recently a discrepancy in the way the prime is positioned in the presence of an index as in $f'_n$ or $f_n'$ (please see the attached PDF). However the positioning is correct in expressions such as $u^k_n$. The problem shows up only in mkiv, and as far as I can say the differnece between the results in mkii and mkiv appeared recently (unfortunately I can't say when…).
something got lost when cleaning up the code ... fixed (but we have smaller primes .. i'll make a large option one day but rather wait till there is a trivial extension to luatex (that i need to discuss with taco)
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Otared Kavian