Re: [NTG-context] Testpage with extras
use case needed
Here two cases to compare: 1. \setupindenting[yes, 9pt, first] \starttext \noindentation\input knuth\\ \input knuth\blank \noindentation \input knuth \testpage[35]\noindentation\input knuth \stoptext 2. \setupindenting[yes, 9pt, first] \starttext \noindentation\input knuth\\ \input knuth\blank \noindentation \input knuth \testpage[10]\noindentation\input knuth \stoptext In the second case the testpage is not active, but the "noindentation" (the one right after it) still is (correct bahavior of course). But I want to link this "testpage" and this "noindentation" with each other, s.t. both are active, if the line-criterion is true, and both are not acting, if not. That is, what I meant with "\testpage[n,noindentation]". Could I make it clear now? Huseyin
On 1/30/2014 12:34 PM, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
use case needed
Here two cases to compare:
1.
\setupindenting[yes, 9pt, first] \starttext \noindentation\input knuth\\ \input knuth\blank \noindentation \input knuth \testpage[35]\noindentation\input knuth \stoptext
2.
\setupindenting[yes, 9pt, first] \starttext \noindentation\input knuth\\ \input knuth\blank \noindentation \input knuth \testpage[10]\noindentation\input knuth \stoptext
In the second case the testpage is not active, but the "noindentation" (the one right after it) still is (correct bahavior of course). But I want to link this "testpage" and this "noindentation" with each other, s.t. both are active, if the line-criterion is true, and both are not acting, if not. That is, what I meant with "\testpage[n,noindentation]".
Could I make it clear now?
new in beta .... please wikify ... \definepagechecker [whatever] [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation] \setupindenting[yes,9pt,first] \starttext \noindentation \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \noindentation \input knuth\par \checkpage[whatever] \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \stoptext ... i assume that others (read: Wolfgang) will check if the old testpage is compatible -) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Hans,
Personally, I find the names used sub-optimal!
I would think something like conditionalbreak or conditionalpagebreak
would be better and verbose.
Other names could be ifpagelength, ifpagelengthstill, leftonpage, or something
similar.
I assume you have implemented checkpage as an added layer on top
of testpage!
At least the test is if X lines left on page or still fit on page!
I also have a question. Are the commands setuppagechecker sothat
\definepagechecker[whatever]
\setuppagechecker[whatever]
[lines=35,
voffset=10pt,
before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par},
after=\noindentation]
and also
\checkpage [lines=35,
voffset=10pt,
before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par},
after=\noindentation]
Question: what is the voffset used for? Line height? If so then a better name for this
would be nice, too!
regards
Keith.
Am 30.01.2014 um 22:23 schrieb Hans Hagen
new in beta .... please wikify ...
\definepagechecker [whatever] [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
\setupindenting[yes,9pt,first]
\starttext \noindentation \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \noindentation \input knuth\par \checkpage[whatever] \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \stoptext
... i assume that others (read: Wolfgang) will check if the old testpage is compatible -)
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
On 1/31/2014 10:46 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Personally, I find the names used sub-optimal!
we had testpage and that one stays anyway and checkpage is close to that (overloading testpage with a new syntax is messy)
I would think something like conditionalbreak or conditionalpagebreak would be better and verbose.
the new check command could evolve in more than break .. in fact it just checks and then does some action (not per se a break)
Other names could be ifpagelength, ifpagelengthstill, leftonpage, or something similar.
one can say \definepagechecker[leftonpage] and then use it like \chechpage[leftonpage]
I assume you have implemented checkpage as an added layer on top of testpage!
no, the reverse
At least the test is if X lines left on page or still fit on page!
I also have a question. Are the commands setuppagechecker sothat
\definepagechecker[whatever]
\setuppagechecker[whatever] [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
and also
\checkpage [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
in that case you use those values, while \checkpage [whatever] [lines=12] would overload given whatever values
Question: what is the voffset used for? Line height? If so then a better name for this would be nice, too!
it's 'offset' ... and it's like the second argument of testpage (i can't think of another key so i've chosen one that already is part of context, which has advantages)
regards Keith.
Am 30.01.2014 um 22:23 schrieb Hans Hagen
mailto:pragma@wxs.nl>: [snip, snip] new in beta .... please wikify ...
\definepagechecker [whatever] [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
\setupindenting[yes,9pt,first]
\starttext \noindentation \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \noindentation \input knuth\par \checkpage[whatever] \input knuth\par \input knuth\par \stoptext
... i assume that others (read: Wolfgang) will check if the old testpage is compatible -)
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 |www.pragma-ade.com http://www.pragma-ade.com/ |www.pragma-pod.nl http://www.pragma-pod.nl/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Hans,
how about the \ifleftonpage, or something like that?
Just trying to have the name of the command more literate.
Of course if the conditional part is to be expanded to something
more elaborate then pagechecker would be fine!
regards
Keith.
Am 31.01.2014 um 11:18 schrieb Hans Hagen
On 1/31/2014 10:46 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Personally, I find the names used sub-optimal!
we had testpage and that one stays anyway and checkpage is close to that (overloading testpage with a new syntax is messy)
I would think something like conditionalbreak or conditionalpagebreak would be better and verbose.
the new check command could evolve in more than break .. in fact it just checks and then does some action (not per se a break)
Other names could be ifpagelength, ifpagelengthstill, leftonpage, or something similar.
one can say
\definepagechecker[leftonpage]
and then use it like
\chechpage[leftonpage]
I assume you have implemented checkpage as an added layer on top of testpage!
no, the reverse
At least the test is if X lines left on page or still fit on page!
I also have a question. Are the commands setuppagechecker sothat
\definepagechecker[whatever]
\setuppagechecker[whatever] [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
and also
\checkpage [lines=35, voffset=10pt, before={\vfill\wordright{(see next page)}\par}, after=\noindentation]
in that case you use those values, while
\checkpage [whatever] [lines=12]
would overload given whatever values
Question: what is the voffset used for? Line height? If so then a better name for this would be nice, too!
it's 'offset' ... and it's like the second argument of testpage (i can't think of another key so i've chosen one that already is part of context, which has advantages)
[snip, snip]
On 2/1/2014 10:15 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Hans,
how about the \ifleftonpage, or something like that?
\if.... is reserved for 'real' ifs ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
"H. Özoguz"
-
Hans Hagen
-
Keith J. Schultz