Am 2015-08-21 um 22:53 schrieb Hans Hagen :

On 8/16/2015 6:33 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

...

Could you please implement this? Should be really easy… I’m tired of fixing the boxes in Acrobat every time. Thank you very much!

The next beta will have this extra 'feature':

\showframe

\setuplayout [location=middle, width=middle, height=middle, cropoffset=auto, trimoffset=1bp, bleedoffset=2bp, artoffset=2bp]

\starttext

\definepapersize[TestA][width=100bp,height=200bp] \definepapersize[TestB][width=150bp,height=250bp]

\setuppapersize[TestA][TestB]

test

\stoptext

The auto option only works with layout=middle (message otherwise) as I'm not going to add all kind of extra calculation code to an already bit overloaded mechanism deep down. The offset are accumulative (so crop < trim < bleed < art). In Haralds case cropoffset=auto should be enough. The default crop and trimbox handling is unchanged (as it would complicate my own workflows and also breaks compatibility) so one really needs to set this when it's needed. The already present interactionscreen cropping is unchanged.

Hi Hans, thank you very much for looking into that! I wikified the box information plus your example at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_Boxes Unfortunately, the order (crop < trim < bleed < art) is not so good, it should be (art < crop < trim < bleed) - as I wrote, in PDF/X, ArtBox must be the same as TrimBox, if defined at all. Would you please fix this? (I don’t know any use of ArtBox - it was meant for imposition, but software will probably look for page contents itself, since ArtBox is mostly undefined.) Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)

Am 2015-08-24 um 14:21 schrieb Hans Hagen :

On 8/23/2015 4:49 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

...

Unfortunately, the order (crop < trim < bleed < art) is not so good, it should be (art < crop < trim < bleed) - as I wrote, in PDF/X, ArtBox must be the same as TrimBox, if defined at all. Would you please fix this?

hm, one of these fuzzy parts of the spec

...

(I don’t know any use of ArtBox - it was meant for imposition, but software will probably look for page contents itself, since ArtBox is mostly undefined.)

i've just commented it as i don't care too much about those boxes anyway

Good enough, thanks! Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)

On 8/27/2015 10:34 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

Am 2015-08-24 um 14:32 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm :

...

...

...

(I don’t know any use of ArtBox - it was meant for imposition, but software will probably look for page contents itself, since ArtBox is mostly undefined.)

i've just commented it as i don't care too much about those boxes anyway

Good enough, thanks!

Hm, did you mean, you commented the whole code? I’m updating daily, but Acrobat doesn’t show me any boxes. Or did maybe my update ignore some files? Which should I check?

i only commented the artbox ... ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------