Greetings! Is there an IRC (Internatl Relay Channel) for ConTeXt? If so, which server and channel name? If not, is one allowed to form an unofficial one? Thanks, --tk
Lazycode
Is there an IRC (Internatl Relay Channel) for ConTeXt? If
No.
so, which server and channel name? If not, is one allowed to form an unofficial one?
I suggest irc.freenode.net to create one, has bot facilities to keep the channel alive. -- Live long and prosper, Berend de Boer
Dear all, with the help from Hans and some tweaking, installed a font called Dolly on my RedHat system. I've read some good advice on http://home.salamander.com/~wmcclain/context-help.html#newfont although uncommenting the line % \autoloadmapfilestrue in cont-sys.tex AND adding the new built-map to pdftex.cfg like this: % map +texnansi-uw-dolly.map will generate a lot of 'duplicate / ignored' messages. Is one of them better? The file texnansi-uw-dolly.tex gives a nice font-mapping, so everything seems to be installed just fine. There is still one mountain/hill to climb: I'm not able to use the font in my text. I created a type-dolly.tex file, and put it in my path. It looks like this: --- % % Underwear Dolly % \usetypescriptfile [type-buy] \loadmapfile [texnansi-uw-dolly.map] \starttypescript [serif] [dolly] [texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Bold] [texnansi-DollyBol] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Italic] [texnansi-DollyIta] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Roman] [texnansi-DollyRom] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-SmallCaps] [texnansi-DollySmaCap] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Ligatuur-Bold] [texnansi-DollyLigBol] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Ligatuur-Italic] [texnansi-DollyLigIta] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [Dolly-Ligatuur-Roman] [texnansi-DollyLigRom] [encoding=texnansi] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [serif] [dolly] [name] \usetypescript [serif] [fallback] \definefontsynonym [Serif] [Dolly-Roman] \definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [Dolly-Bold] \definefontsynonym [SerifItalic] [Dolly-Italic] \definefontsynonym [SerifCaps] [Dolly-SmallCaps] \definefontsynonym [OldStyle] [Dolly-SmallCaps] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [Dolly] \definetypeface [Dolly] [rm] [serif] [dolly] [default] [enconding=texnansi] \stoptypescript --- Then I made a small test-file, like this: \usetypescriptfile[type-dolly] \usetypescript[Dolly] \setupbodyfont[Dolly] \starttext This is Dolly roman, {\it italic,} {\bf bold,} and {\bi bold-italic.} {\em \bf This is also bold-italic.} We have {\sc small caps} and old-style figures: {\os 0123456789}. \stoptext Then texexec --pdf test-file.tex complains bodyfont : unknown variant Dolly Can anybody see what I'm doing wrong? I'm running pdfetex 3.14159-14h-released-20010417-2.1 (Web2C 7.3.3.1) on a RedHat 8.0 Linux system. Thanks for your time & help, Roef Ragas
Roef Ragas
in cont-sys.tex AND adding the new built-map to pdftex.cfg like this: % map +texnansi-uw-dolly.map will generate a lot of 'duplicate / ignored' messages. Is one of them better?
I don't know. Nowerdays I add the mapfiles with updmap: updmap --enable Map dolly.map But this might require a rather new tetex system. put these lines (actually you have to define rm, ss *and* tt!) in the .tex file after the line \usetypescriptfile[type-dolly].
\starttypescript [Dolly] \definetypeface [Dolly] [rm] [serif] [dolly] [default] [enconding=texnansi] \stoptypescript ---
Then I made a small test-file, like this:
\usetypescriptfile[type-dolly]
[put the lines here!] \definetypeface [Dolly][rm][serif][dolly][default] [encoding=ec] \definetypeface [Dolly][ss][sans][helvetica][default] [rscale=.9, encoding=ec] \definetypeface [Dolly][tt][mono][computer-modern][computer-modern][rscale=1.1,encoding=ec]
\usetypescript[Dolly]
this is not needed.
\setupbodyfont[Dolly]
HTH. Patrick
Op zo 19-01-2003, om 21:27 schreef Patrick Gundlach:
Roef Ragas
writes: I don't know. Nowerdays I add the mapfiles with updmap: updmap --enable Map dolly.map But this might require a rather new tetex system.
That generates an enormous amount of error messages here...
put these lines (actually you have to define rm, ss *and* tt!)
Even if you're not using them?
\usetypescriptfile[type-dolly]
[put the lines here!]
\definetypeface [Dolly][rm][serif][dolly][default] [encoding=ec] \definetypeface [Dolly][ss][sans][helvetica][default] [rscale=.9, encoding=ec] \definetypeface [Dolly][tt][mono][computer-modern][computer-modern][rscale=1.1,encoding=ec]
\usetypescript[Dolly]
this is not needed.
\setupbodyfont[Dolly]
I did like you told me. The encoding Dolly uses is texnansi, so that's the only thing I changed. But alas, this doesn't help either. I tried commenting and uncommenting lines but haven't found anything yet. I'm now reinstalling TeTeX to do everything again from scratch... Thanks for your help, Roef Ragas
Roef Ragas
Op zo 19-01-2003, om 21:27 schreef Patrick Gundlach:
Roef Ragas
writes:
That generates an enormous amount of error messages here...
OK, forget it then :)
put these lines (actually you have to define rm, ss *and* tt!) Even if you're not using them?
Well, I'd gess no.
I did like you told me. The encoding Dolly uses is texnansi, so that's the only thing I changed.
Sorry, this was a copy and paste error from my dolly-files.
But alas, this doesn't help either.
I'll send you my two files off-list to test. Patrick
I tried commenting and uncommenting lines but haven't found anything yet. I'm now reinstalling TeTeX to do everything again from scratch... Thanks for your help,
you could think about installing texlive 7, which is relly great! Patrick -- Mehr Buchstaben - mehr Spass
On 19 Jan 2003 20:33:21 +0100
Roef Ragas
although uncommenting the line % \autoloadmapfilestrue in cont-sys.tex AND adding the new built-map to pdftex.cfg like this: % map +texnansi-uw-dolly.map will generate a lot of 'duplicate / ignored' messages. Is one of them better?
My scripts generate a lot of warning messages also. I ignore them if they don't references a font I am using.
Then texexec --pdf test-file.tex complains
bodyfont : unknown variant Dolly
Did you run texhash after creating the typescript file? Introducing any new file requires the filename database be refreshed. -Bill -- Sattre Press Pagan Papers http://sattre-press.com/ by Kenneth Grahame info@sattre-press.com http://pp.sattre-press.com/
Op zo 19-01-2003, om 22:23 schreef Bill McClain:
On 19 Jan 2003 20:33:21 +0100 Roef Ragas
wrote: My scripts generate a lot of warning messages also. I ignore them if they don't references a font I am using. That is probably the wisest thing to do ;-D
Then texexec --pdf test-file.tex complains
bodyfont : unknown variant Dolly
Did you run texhash after creating the typescript file? Introducing any new file requires the filename database be refreshed. Yes I did. It would be nice if it was something like this though. Thanks for your help, reinstalling everything at the moment just to be sure...
Roef
-Bill
At 07:43 AM 1/20/2003 +1300, you wrote:
Lazycode
writes: Is there an IRC (Internatl Relay Channel) for ConTeXt? If
No.
so, which server and channel name? If not, is one allowed to form an unofficial one?
I suggest irc.freenode.net to create one, has bot facilities to keep the channel alive.
i leave this initiative to the both of you then (I must admit that I don't even know what an IRC is) Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (6)
-
Berend de Boer
-
Bill McClain
-
Hans Hagen
-
Lazycode
-
Patrick Gundlach
-
Roef Ragas