another issue with PDF bookmarks
Dear list, I have a sample that shows an issue with PDF bookmarks: \setupinteraction[state=start] \placebookmarks[chapter] \setupheadertexts[chapter] \starttext \completecontent \chapter{Footnote\footnote{Only in bookmarks}} \stoptext Sorry, but I don’t know why the footnote is removed in the table of contents and in the header, but it isn‘t in the bookmark. Am I missing something? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 08.04.2014 16:20, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have a sample that shows an issue with PDF bookmarks:
\setupinteraction[state=start] \placebookmarks[chapter] \setupheadertexts[chapter] \starttext \completecontent
\chapter{Footnote\footnote{Only in bookmarks}}
\stoptext
Sorry, but I don’t know why the footnote is removed in the table of contents and in the header, but it isn‘t in the bookmark.
Am I missing something?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo That probably has to do with expansion (a detailed explanation may be given by a (Con)TeX(t) Guru :-)).
I think the best "fix" is to use the MkIV title mechanism (start... stop...) http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Titles#New_MkIV_Sectioning That way you can do: \startchapter[title={Footnote\footnote{Only where appropriate}}, bookmark={No Footnote}] ... \stopchapter -- Best Regards, Andreas
On 04/09/2014 08:29 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On 08.04.2014 16:20, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have a sample that shows an issue with PDF bookmarks: [...] Sorry, but I don’t know why the footnote is removed in the table of contents and in the header, but it isn‘t in the bookmark.
That probably has to do with expansion (a detailed explanation may be given by a (Con)TeX(t) Guru :-)).
I think the best "fix" is to use the MkIV title mechanism (start... stop...) http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Titles#New_MkIV_Sectioning
That way you can do: \startchapter[title={Footnote\footnote{Only where appropriate}}, bookmark={No Footnote}] ... \stopchapter
Many thanks for your reply, Andreas. This is a way to avoid the problem. F rom the user’s perspective, I cannot see the reason why \footnote isn’t removed from the PDF bookmark automatically. It makes the same sense as in headers and ToC. Sorry, but I’m trying to explain ConTeXt to others. And I have a hard time when I cannot see the reason for what can be seen as glitches. Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 04/09/2014 08:29 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On 08.04.2014 16:20, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have a sample that shows an issue with PDF bookmarks: [...] Sorry, but I don’t know why the footnote is removed in the table of contents and in the header, but it isn‘t in the bookmark.
That probably has to do with expansion (a detailed explanation may be given by a (Con)TeX(t) Guru :-)).
I think the best "fix" is to use the MkIV title mechanism (start... stop...) http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Titles#New_MkIV_Sectioning
That way you can do: \startchapter[title={Footnote\footnote{Only where appropriate}}, bookmark={No Footnote}] ... \stopchapter
Many thanks for your reply, Andreas.
This is a way to avoid the problem. F rom the user’s perspective, I cannot see the reason why \footnote isn’t removed from the PDF bookmark automatically. It makes the same sense as in headers and ToC.
One possibility is to add: \appendtoks \let\footnote \gobbleoneargument \to \everysimplifycommands to your style. Perhaps this should be added to the definition of definenote. Aditya
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
One possibility is to add:
\appendtoks \let\footnote \gobbleoneargument \to \everysimplifycommands
to your style.
Perhaps this should be added to the definition of definenote.
Hmm... simplifycommands needs an overhaul:
From typo-del.mkiv:
\appendtoks \def\quotation#1{"#1"}% \def\quote #1{'#1'}% \to \everysimplifycommands and from buff-ver.mkiv: \appendtoks \def\type#1{\letterbackslash\checkedstrippedcsname#1}% or maybe detokenize \def\tex #1{\letterbackslash#1}% \to \everysimplifycommands The simplification of \type assumes that a user will always use \type{\command} and gives the wrong result for \type{text} and fails for \type{text\undefined}. The simplification of \quote and \quotation should not be hardcoded, but rather be a part of \definedelimitedtext. Apart from notes and delimited text, are there other commands that need to be simplified for bookmarks, etc? Aditya
On 04/09/2014 09:33 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
One possibility is to add:
\appendtoks \let\footnote \gobbleoneargument \to \everysimplifycommands
to your style.
Perhaps this should be added to the definition of definenote.
Hmm... simplifycommands needs an overhaul:
From typo-del.mkiv:
\appendtoks \def\quotation#1{"#1"}% \def\quote #1{'#1'}% \to \everysimplifycommands
and from buff-ver.mkiv:
\appendtoks \def\type#1{\letterbackslash\checkedstrippedcsname#1}% or maybe detokenize \def\tex #1{\letterbackslash#1}% \to \everysimplifycommands
The simplification of \type assumes that a user will always use \type{\command} and gives the wrong result for \type{text} and fails for \type{text\undefined}.
The simplification of \quote and \quotation should not be hardcoded, but rather be a part of \definedelimitedtext.
Apart from notes and delimited text, are there other commands that need to be simplified for bookmarks, etc?
Many thanks for your reply, Aditya. If I don’t get it wrong, I guess all language and style commands should be ignored. And all braces, when not explicitly invoked (such as in \{). But this only would affect to PDF bookmarks. Many thanks again, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 4/9/2014 9:33 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
One possibility is to add:
\appendtoks \let\footnote \gobbleoneargument \to \everysimplifycommands
to your style.
Perhaps this should be added to the definition of definenote.
Hmm... simplifycommands needs an overhaul:
From typo-del.mkiv:
\appendtoks \def\quotation#1{"#1"}% \def\quote #1{'#1'}% \to \everysimplifycommands
and from buff-ver.mkiv:
\appendtoks \def\type#1{\letterbackslash\checkedstrippedcsname#1}% or maybe detokenize \def\tex #1{\letterbackslash#1}% \to \everysimplifycommands
The simplification of \type assumes that a user will always use \type{\command} and gives the wrong result for \type{text} and fails for \type{text\undefined}.
The simplification of \quote and \quotation should not be hardcoded, but rather be a part of \definedelimitedtext.
Apart from notes and delimited text, are there other commands that need to be simplified for bookmarks, etc?
this kind of things are always tricky ... simplify vs ignore and so there is an experimental option: \enabledirectives[references.bookmarks.preroll] which also work to some extend with math: $\sqrt{123}$ i've made that one also ignore notes (beta coming) concerning the undefined commands (\command) ... ad \let\command\relax to the preamble then ... there is no way we can predict all that and we're in a different catcode regime at that point Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Andreas Schneider -
Hans Hagen -
Pablo Rodriguez