The code in \seeindex has a bug. There was something in the mailing list about a year ago (2004-06-21), but as far as I can see, the patch Hans proposed then has been integrated into core-reg.tex. Here's a minimal test file: \starttext This \index{this} and \index{and} that \seeindex{this}. \placeindex \stoptext And the error log: ! Argument of \@@filterlevelpart has an extra }. <inserted text> \par <to be read again> } \doifprevlevelelse ...tor \@@filterlevelpart [#1]} \edef \@@tocsectiontype {\... \dosetpageregisterpage ...->\doifreglevelelse [#5] {\dodosetpageregisterpage ... l.46 ...isterpage{index}{,}{3}{2::0:0:0:0:0:0:0}{} Unfortunately, the bug messes up the .tui file, so even if you delete the \seeindex command, the file will not compile unless you delete the .tui manually. Ideas, anybody? Best Thomas
And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you modify my example like so: \starttext This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}. \placeindex \stoptext you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in the index under "h," And under "n" ==> capital letters are not taken into account in index generation, which is a trifle inconvenient. Best Thomas On Sep 27, 2005, at 11:58 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
The code in \seeindex has a bug. There was something in the mailing list about a year ago (2004-06-21), but as far as I can see, the patch Hans proposed then has been integrated into core-reg.tex. Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
This \index{this} and \index{and} that \seeindex{this}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
And the error log:
! Argument of \@@filterlevelpart has an extra }. <inserted text> \par <to be read again> } \doifprevlevelelse ...tor \@@filterlevelpart [#1]} \edef \@@tocsectiontype {\...
\dosetpageregisterpage ...->\doifreglevelelse [#5]
{\dodosetpageregisterpage ... l.46 ...isterpage{index}{,}{3}{2::0:0:0:0:0:0:0}{}
Unfortunately, the bug messes up the .tui file, so even if you delete the \seeindex command, the file will not compile unless you delete the .tui manually. Ideas, anybody?
Best
Thomas _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you modify my example like so:
\starttext
This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in the index under "h," And under "n" ==> capital letters are not taken into account in index generation, which is a trifle inconvenient.
hmm, not for me. This and That are under 't', And under 'a' # texexec --version TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005 texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005 texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004 tex : pdfeTeXk, 3.141592-1.30.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.5) context : ver: 2005.08.31 cont-en : ver: 2005.08.31 fmt: 2005.9.8 mes: english cont-nl : ver: 2005.08.31 fmt: 2005.9.8 mes: english luigi
OK, I have to modify my last mail: the bizarre sorting bug only occurs when I use newtexexec. The bug with /seeindex occurs both in newtexexec and "old" texexec. Thanks luigi, for looking at this! Thomas On Sep 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, luigi.scarso wrote:
hmm, not for me. This and That are under 't', And under 'a'
participants (2)
-
luigi.scarso -
Thomas A. Schmitz