Hi, something is wrong with the column placement or I did something wrong. I want them on both columns or at least at the right one. % \setupfootnotes[location=columns] % -> box0 \setupfootnotes[location=lastcolumn] % -> = firstcolumn \starttext \startcolumns \dorecurse{10}{test \footnote{one one one one one one} \input zapf \footnote{two two two two two two} } \stopcolumns \stoptext Greetings Andreas
Hi, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
something is wrong with the column placement or I did something wrong. I want them on both columns or at least at the right one.
% \setupfootnotes[location=columns] % -> box0 \setupfootnotes[location=lastcolumn] % -> = firstcolumn
There is a bug in strc-not.mkiv, it exchanges the numeric values of 'lastcolumn' (3) and 'firstcolumn' (4) when compared to mkii. Lines 328,329 should read: \setvalue{\??vn @\v!lastcolumn }{\setnotelocation\plusthree} \setvalue{\??vn @\v!firstcolumn}{\setnotelocation\plusfour} Also, there is a missing \ in page-mul.mkiv. Line 944 should read: \box0}% After those two fixes and a format regeneration, your input gets the correct output over here. Best wishes, Taco
Am 27.11.2009 um 17:29 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Hi,
Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
something is wrong with the column placement or I did something wrong. I want them on both columns or at least at the right one.
% \setupfootnotes[location=columns] % -> box0 \setupfootnotes[location=lastcolumn] % -> = firstcolumn
There is a bug in strc-not.mkiv, it exchanges the numeric values of 'lastcolumn' (3) and 'firstcolumn' (4) when compared to mkii.
Lines 328,329 should read:
\setvalue{\??vn @\v!lastcolumn }{\setnotelocation\plusthree} \setvalue{\??vn @\v!firstcolumn}{\setnotelocation\plusfour}
Also, there is a missing \ in page-mul.mkiv.
Line 944 should read:
\box0}%
After those two fixes and a format regeneration, your input gets the correct output over here.
Thanks Taco, its fixed in the new beta. Andreas
participants (2)
-
Andreas Harder
-
Taco Hoekwater