Hi Hans, as I posted to the list in the past and it has been confirmed by Wolfgang Schuster, there is a bug that prevents the proper separation of paragraph notes from text body. Here you have a sample: \setupbodyfont[pagella] \setupnote[footnote][paragraph=yes] \setupnotation[footnote][alternative=serried,display=no] \starttext \dorecurse{500}{text text text\footnote{note} } \stoptext Would it be possible that this bug could be fixed? (This is specially important for critical apparati.) Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 09/06/13 18:55, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 06/09/2013 01:01 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Would it be possible that this bug could be fixed? (This is specially important for critical apparati.)
"apparati," eh?
Isn't it the plural for apparatus? (I mean the Latin one, although I might have forgotten the declensions as well.) Apparatuses sounds weird to me. If I'm not wrong, There is a similar rule in German (this might be the cause of my mistake). Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 06/09/2013 07:16 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Isn't it the plural for apparatus? (I mean the Latin one, although I might have forgotten the declensions as well.) Apparatuses sounds weird to me.
It's apparatus (long u, fourth declension). apparati is a pseudo-learned form, like "virii."
By the way, Thomas, haven't you found this bug in any of your editions?
No, I use linenotes (and, to be honest, the edition project has been in hiatus for some time now, I need to pick it up again). Thomas
On 09/06/13 21:01, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 06/09/2013 07:16 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Isn't it the plural for apparatus? (I mean the Latin one, although I might have forgotten the declensions as well.) Apparatuses sounds weird to me.
It's apparatus (long u, fourth declension). apparati is a pseudo-learned form, like "virii."
Many thanks, Thomas, I'd never thought it was fourth declension. I assumed it was second declension.
By the way, Thomas, haven't you found this bug in any of your editions?
No, I use linenotes (and, to be honest, the edition project has been in hiatus for some time now, I need to pick it up again).
I found the bug in linenotes, but it seems not to be specific to paragraphed linenotes but to paragraphed notes (as Wolfgang kindly noted). Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 6/10/2013 7:32 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
On 09/06/13 21:01, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 06/09/2013 07:16 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Isn't it the plural for apparatus? (I mean the Latin one, although I might have forgotten the declensions as well.) Apparatuses sounds weird to me.
It's apparatus (long u, fourth declension). apparati is a pseudo-learned form, like "virii."
Many thanks, Thomas, I'd never thought it was fourth declension. I assumed it was second declension.
By the way, Thomas, haven't you found this bug in any of your editions?
No, I use linenotes (and, to be honest, the edition project has been in hiatus for some time now, I need to pick it up again).
I found the bug in linenotes, but it seems not to be specific to paragraphed linenotes but to paragraphed notes (as Wolfgang kindly noted).
a next upload will have slightly improved paragraph notes but it will always be a bit tricky (so one can best have tolerant settings) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 6/10/2013 8:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 7:32 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
On 09/06/13 21:01, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 06/09/2013 07:16 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Isn't it the plural for apparatus? (I mean the Latin one, although I might have forgotten the declensions as well.) Apparatuses sounds weird to me.
It's apparatus (long u, fourth declension). apparati is a pseudo-learned form, like "virii."
Many thanks, Thomas, I'd never thought it was fourth declension. I assumed it was second declension.
By the way, Thomas, haven't you found this bug in any of your editions?
No, I use linenotes (and, to be honest, the edition project has been in hiatus for some time now, I need to pick it up again).
I found the bug in linenotes, but it seems not to be specific to paragraphed linenotes but to paragraphed notes (as Wolfgang kindly noted).
a next upload will have slightly improved paragraph notes but it will always be a bit tricky (so one can best have tolerant settings)
best wikify this: \setupbodyfont [pagella] \setupnote [footnote] [paragraph=yes] \setupnotation [footnote] [alternative=serried, width=broad, distance=.5em, display=no] \starttext \dorecurse{500}{text text text\footnote{note} } \stoptext ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 10/06/13 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 8:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 7:32 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
I found the bug in linenotes, but it seems not to be specific to paragraphed linenotes but to paragraphed notes (as Wolfgang kindly noted).
a next upload will have slightly improved paragraph notes but it will always be a bit tricky (so one can best have tolerant settings)
Many thanks, Hans, for your fast fix in the beta from yesterday.
best wikify this:
Sorry, but I don't get it. The only difference I see is the width=broad setting (sorry if I miss the point). Is this the key to avoid issues? (Sorry, but my examples seem to have no problem now.) Many thanks for your help, Pablo
\setupbodyfont [pagella]
\setupnote [footnote] [paragraph=yes]
\setupnotation [footnote] [alternative=serried, width=broad, distance=.5em, display=no]
\starttext \dorecurse{500}{text text text\footnote{note} } \stoptext
On 6/11/2013 7:11 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
On 10/06/13 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 8:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/10/2013 7:32 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
I found the bug in linenotes, but it seems not to be specific to paragraphed linenotes but to paragraphed notes (as Wolfgang kindly noted).
a next upload will have slightly improved paragraph notes but it will always be a bit tricky (so one can best have tolerant settings)
Many thanks, Hans, for your fast fix in the beta from yesterday.
best wikify this:
Sorry, but I don't get it.
The only difference I see is the width=broad setting (sorry if I miss the point).
well, others could benefit ...
Is this the key to avoid issues? (Sorry, but my examples seem to have no problem now.)
no, that just helps a bit (sometimes) i just changed the implementation abit
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
\setupbodyfont [pagella]
\setupnote [footnote] [paragraph=yes]
\setupnotation [footnote] [alternative=serried, width=broad, distance=.5em, display=no]
\starttext \dorecurse{500}{text text text\footnote{note} } \stoptext
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/06/13 20:54, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/11/2013 7:11 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
The only difference I see is the width=broad setting (sorry if I miss the point).
well, others could benefit ...
Done (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Footnotes#Footnotes_in_pagraph_form). Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 09/06/13 18:55, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 06/09/2013 01:01 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Would it be possible that this bug could be fixed? (This is specially important for critical apparati.)
"apparati," eh?
By the way, Thomas, haven't you found this bug in any of your editions? Many thanks, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Pablo Rodríguez -
Thomas A. Schmitz