is there a reason not to fix this bug?
Dear community, Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today): strc-lst.mkvi: \def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings% {\begingroup \edef\currentlist{#tag}% \setupcurrentlist[#settings]% \the\everystructurelist % \doif{\listparameter\c!coupling}\v!on{\startlistreferences{#tag}}% \doplacestructurelist % maybe inline {#list}% {\listparameter\c!criterium}% {\listparameter\c!number}% {\listparameter\c!extras}% {\listparameter\c!order}% % \stoplistreferences + \par \endgroup \strc_lists_set_mode} to fix the following bug with beta (first item on content list is indented, but the second isn't): \setuplist[chapter][alternative=d,margin=2em] \starttext \completecontent \part{Part} \chapter{Chapter} a \part{Part} \chapter{Chapter} b \stoptext I'm probably missing something, but this was reported two betas ago and I reported this again on the previous beta. I don't know whether this bug might not be fixed due to other reasons or it was simply forgotten. Many thanks for your awesome work, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 10-3-2012 21:57, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Dear community,
Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today):
strc-lst.mkvi:
1 - comment (for a while) 2 - remove (as no longer relevant) 3 - repair (because broken) it needs time to choose one and there is only so much of it available Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 12/03/12 08:58, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10-3-2012 21:57, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Dear community,
Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today):
strc-lst.mkvi:
1 - comment (for a while) 2 - remove (as no longer relevant) 3 - repair (because broken)
it needs time to choose one and there is only so much of it available
Sorry for the late reply, Hans (I don't have daily access to my personal computer [and when I sit in front of it, I have a bunch of things to do). Many thanks for fixing the bug. I'm afraid I don't understand your reply (sorry, but it's all Greek to me, I don't get the context [no pun intended in both cases]) I apologize if my original message wasn't kind or respectful enough. I didn't understand what happened and I was searching for an answer (of course, not demanding it). I really appreciate your awesome work and the work of the community members (especially Wolfgang). Many thanks for it to everyone. I would like contribute to ConTeXt, but right now I'm afraid I can mainly report bugs (and ask questions on what I don't understand and I'm not able to find elsewhere). Sorry for the bad tone of my previous request (if my question sounded demanding). I'm really thankful for ConTeXt and the community around of it (although I don't know to express my gratitude sometimes). Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
Hi Wolfgang,
strc-lst.mkvi:
\def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings%
+ \par
... did you test it with other cases? Technically we can have inline lists. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Am 12.03.2012 um 08:59 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Hi Wolfgang,
strc-lst.mkvi:
\def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings%
+ \par
... did you test it with other cases? Technically we can have inline lists.
Yes it works because the \par is added after the last entry in the paragraph for inline lists. Wolfgang
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Pablo Rodríguez -
Wolfgang Schuster