consistent index entries
Hi, besides the CG journal I’m working on a scientific biography with huge person and locality indexes (named Person and Locality for the examples). In many cases, the author wants additional information in the index, e.g. \Locality{Altona (Hamburg)} \Locallity{Breslau (pol. Wrocław)} or \Person{Arends, Katharina (née Schoemaker)} \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} Now, I need that consistent and I don’t want to type these complicated entries every time. I’m looking for a good way to handle this – maybe a lookup table in Lua, so that \LookupPerson{Willy II} would call a Lua function that returns \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} ? Or is there already something in place that I overlooked, like \OverwriteIndexEntry{Hraban}{Ramm, Henning Hraban} ? Hraban
Am 01.08.2020 um 13:22 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm
: Hi,
besides the CG journal I’m working on a scientific biography with huge person and locality indexes (named Person and Locality for the examples).
In many cases, the author wants additional information in the index, e.g.
\Locality{Altona (Hamburg)} \Locality{Breslau (pol. Wrocław)} or \Person{Arends, Katharina (née Schoemaker)} \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)}
Now, I need that consistent and I don’t want to type these complicated entries every time.
I’m looking for a good way to handle this – maybe a lookup table in Lua, so that \LookupPerson{Willy II} would call a Lua function that returns \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} ?
Or is there already something in place that I overlooked, like \OverwriteIndexEntry{Hraban}{Ramm, Henning Hraban} ?
I came up with: \startluacode user.Lookups = { ["Albano"] = "Albano (Provinz Rom)", ["Altona"] = "Altona (Hamburg)", ["Aurich"] = "Aurich (Ostfriesland)" } function user.Lookup(Name) local Res = user.Lookups[Name] if Res then return context(Res) else return context(Name) end end \stopluacode \def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}} \starttext \Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \strut\page \placeindex \stoptext The lookup works so far, but all the entries get sorted unter C (because of \ctxlua). I remember I had the same problem with other macros (like \index{\emph{bla}}), but can’t find a solution in my usual sources. Hraban
Hi, Henning. According to the garden, something like: \def\Ort#1{\index[#1]{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}} as long as #1 is capable of being sorted in the normal way, should work. Regards, Jairo El sáb., 1 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 13:49, Henning Hraban Ramm ( texml@fiee.net) escribió:
Am 01.08.2020 um 13:22 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm
: Hi,
besides the CG journal I’m working on a scientific biography with huge person and locality indexes (named Person and Locality for the examples).
In many cases, the author wants additional information in the index, e.g.
\Locality{Altona (Hamburg)} \Locality{Breslau (pol. Wrocław)} or \Person{Arends, Katharina (née Schoemaker)} \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)}
Now, I need that consistent and I don’t want to type these complicated entries every time.
I’m looking for a good way to handle this – maybe a lookup table in Lua, so that \LookupPerson{Willy II} would call a Lua function that returns \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} ?
Or is there already something in place that I overlooked, like \OverwriteIndexEntry{Hraban}{Ramm, Henning Hraban} ?
I came up with:
\startluacode user.Lookups = { ["Albano"] = "Albano (Provinz Rom)", ["Altona"] = "Altona (Hamburg)", ["Aurich"] = "Aurich (Ostfriesland)" }
function user.Lookup(Name) local Res = user.Lookups[Name] if Res then return context(Res) else return context(Name) end end \stopluacode
\def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
\starttext
\Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \strut\page
\placeindex
\stoptext
The lookup works so far, but all the entries get sorted unter C (because of \ctxlua).
I remember I had the same problem with other macros (like \index{\emph{bla}}), but can’t find a solution in my usual sources.
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
Wrt formatting (e.g. \index{\emph{something}}), the garden also mentions processors for MkIV (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Registers#Processors), so you can wrap them with custom commands, in case it helps. Cordially, Jairo. El sáb., 1 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 14:01, Jairo A. del Rio ( jairoadelrio6@gmail.com) escribió:
Hi, Henning. According to the garden, something like:
\def\Ort#1{\index[#1]{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
as long as #1 is capable of being sorted in the normal way, should work.
Regards,
Jairo
El sáb., 1 de ago. de 2020 a la(s) 13:49, Henning Hraban Ramm ( texml@fiee.net) escribió:
Am 01.08.2020 um 13:22 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm
: Hi,
besides the CG journal I’m working on a scientific biography with huge person and locality indexes (named Person and Locality for the examples).
In many cases, the author wants additional information in the index, e.g.
\Locality{Altona (Hamburg)} \Locality{Breslau (pol. Wrocław)} or \Person{Arends, Katharina (née Schoemaker)} \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)}
Now, I need that consistent and I don’t want to type these complicated entries every time.
I’m looking for a good way to handle this – maybe a lookup table in Lua, so that \LookupPerson{Willy II} would call a Lua function that returns \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} ?
Or is there already something in place that I overlooked, like \OverwriteIndexEntry{Hraban}{Ramm, Henning Hraban} ?
I came up with:
\startluacode user.Lookups = { ["Albano"] = "Albano (Provinz Rom)", ["Altona"] = "Altona (Hamburg)", ["Aurich"] = "Aurich (Ostfriesland)" }
function user.Lookup(Name) local Res = user.Lookups[Name] if Res then return context(Res) else return context(Name) end end \stopluacode
\def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
\starttext
\Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \strut\page
\placeindex
\stoptext
The lookup works so far, but all the entries get sorted unter C (because of \ctxlua).
I remember I had the same problem with other macros (like \index{\emph{bla}}), but can’t find a solution in my usual sources.
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
Am 01.08.2020 um 21:01 schrieb Jairo A. del Rio
: Hi, Henning. According to the garden, something like:
\def\Ort#1{\index[#1]{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
as long as #1 is capable of being sorted in the normal way, should work.
Thank you, but that doesn’t work if my lookup e.g. creates "Garmisch-Partenkirchen" from "Partenkirchen".
Am 01.08.2020 um 21:18 schrieb Jairo A. del Rio
: Wrt formatting (e.g. \index{\emph{something}}), the garden also mentions processors for MkIV (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Registers#Processors), so you can wrap them with custom commands, in case it helps.
I already use processors; \emph was just an example. Hraban
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 01.08.2020 um 20:49:
Am 01.08.2020 um 13:22 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm
: Hi,
besides the CG journal I’m working on a scientific biography with huge person and locality indexes (named Person and Locality for the examples).
In many cases, the author wants additional information in the index, e.g.
\Locality{Altona (Hamburg)} \Locality{Breslau (pol. Wrocław)} or \Person{Arends, Katharina (née Schoemaker)} \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)}
Now, I need that consistent and I don’t want to type these complicated entries every time.
I’m looking for a good way to handle this – maybe a lookup table in Lua, so that \LookupPerson{Willy II} would call a Lua function that returns \Person{Wilhelm II. (Kaiser)} ?
Or is there already something in place that I overlooked, like \OverwriteIndexEntry{Hraban}{Ramm, Henning Hraban} ?
I came up with:
\startluacode user.Lookups = { ["Albano"] = "Albano (Provinz Rom)", ["Altona"] = "Altona (Hamburg)", ["Aurich"] = "Aurich (Ostfriesland)" }
function user.Lookup(Name) local Res = user.Lookups[Name] if Res then return context(Res) else return context(Name) end end \stopluacode
\def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
You have to expand the \index argument: \define[1]\Ort{\expanded{\index{...}}}
\starttext
\Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \strut\page
\placeindex
\stoptext
The lookup works so far, but all the entries get sorted unter C (because of \ctxlua).
I remember I had the same problem with other macros (like \index{\emph{bla}}), but can’t find a solution in my usual sources.
When you use formatting commands etc. you have to use the optional argument for sorting. You can avoid a few problems when you move the \index command to Lua and use context.index or you use a pure TeX solution. %%%% begin lua example \startluacode userdata = userdata or { } userdata.lookup = { ["Albano"] = "Albano (Provinz Rom)", -- ["Altona"] = "Altona (Hamburg)", ["Aurich"] = "Aurich (Ostfriesland)" } function userdata.index(name) local indexentry = userdata.lookup[name] or name context.index(indexentry) end \stopluacode \define[1]\Ort{\ctxlua{userdata.index("#1")}} \starttext \Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \dontleavehmode\page \placeindex \stoptext %%%% end lua example %%%% begin tex example \setvariables [index] [Albano={Albano (Provinz Rom)}, %Altona={Altona (Hamburg)}, Aurich={Aurich (Ostfriesland)}] \define[1]\Ort {\doifelsevariable{index}{#1} {\expanded{\index{\getvariable{index}{#1}}}} {\index{#1}}} \starttext \Ort{Albano} \Ort{Altona} \Ort{Aurich} \dontleavehmode\page \placeindex \stoptext %%%% end tex example Wolfgang
Am 01.08.2020 um 21:30 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster
: \def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
You have to expand the \index argument:
\define[1]\Ort{\expanded{\index{...}}}
Ah, I never know where to expand (tried \expanded\ctxlua). Now, \def\TOrt#1{\expanded{\Ort{\ctxlua{userdata.Lookup("#1")}}}#1} % Loc + Text \defineprocessor[kursiv][style=italicface] \def\TFOrt#1{\expanded{\Ort[kursiv->]{\ctxlua{userdata.Lookup("#1")}}}#1} % Loc in Footnote + Text works. :) (I always define \TIndex to avoid doubling, e.g. Hamburg\index{Hamburg}.)
When you use formatting commands etc. you have to use the optional argument for sorting.
I don’t understand. \Ort[kursiv->]{Hamburg} works.
You can avoid a few problems when you move the \index command to Lua and use context.index or you use a pure TeX solution.
%%%% begin lua example
function userdata.index(name) local indexentry = userdata.lookup[name] or name context.index(indexentry) end
That’s nice, but since I use different registers, I’d need to define that function for each. Since I also use several shortcuts (e.g. \TOrt, \TFOrt, \TPerson, \TFPerson) I would multiply the effort on the Lua side. I find my TeX definitions (like above) shorter, where I can use the same Lua function for each. With your code I could at least shorten it to: function userdata.Lookup(name) context(userdata.Lookups[name] or name) end
%%%% begin tex example
Oh, this is also nice. But isn’t the Lua version faster? (I have >600 person entries and a few hundred locations). Thank you! Hraban
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 01.08.2020 um 22:16:
Am 01.08.2020 um 21:30 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster
: \def\Ort#1{\index{\ctxlua{user.Lookup("#1")}}}
You have to expand the \index argument:
\define[1]\Ort{\expanded{\index{...}}}
Ah, I never know where to expand (tried \expanded\ctxlua).
\expanded needs a argument, i.e. \expanded{...}
Now,
\def\TOrt#1{\expanded{\Ort{\ctxlua{userdata.Lookup("#1")}}}#1} % Loc + Text \defineprocessor[kursiv][style=italicface] \def\TFOrt#1{\expanded{\Ort[kursiv->]{\ctxlua{userdata.Lookup("#1")}}}#1} % Loc in Footnote + Text
works. :)
(I always define \TIndex to avoid doubling, e.g. Hamburg\index{Hamburg}.)
When you use formatting commands etc. you have to use the optional argument for sorting.
I don’t understand.
\Ort[kursiv->]{Hamburg} works.
You mentioned only \index{\emph{...}} in your mail ...
You can avoid a few problems when you move the \index command to Lua and use context.index or you use a pure TeX solution.
%%%% begin lua example
function userdata.index(name) local indexentry = userdata.lookup[name] or name context.index(indexentry) end
That’s nice, but since I use different registers, I’d need to define that function for each. Since I also use several shortcuts (e.g. \TOrt, \TFOrt, \TPerson, \TFPerson) I would multiply the effort on the Lua side. I find my TeX definitions (like above) shorter, where I can use the same Lua function for each. With your code I could at least shorten it to:
function userdata.Lookup(name) context(userdata.Lookups[name] or name) end
%%%% begin tex example
Oh, this is also nice. But isn’t the Lua version faster? (I have >600 person entries and a few hundred locations).
Hard to say without testing but the difference can be ignored because \index itself is what take processing time. Wolfgang
Am 01.08.2020 um 22:44 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster
: \define[1]\Ort{\expanded{\index{...}}} Ah, I never know where to expand (tried \expanded\ctxlua).
\expanded needs a argument, i.e. \expanded{...}
I recognized it doesn’t work otherwise. But I thought TeX would always use the next token? Isn’t a command (or its result?) such a token?
When you use formatting commands etc. you have to use the optional argument for sorting. I don’t understand. \Ort[kursiv->]{Hamburg} works.
You mentioned only \index{\emph{...}} in your mail ...
I tried to simplify and couldn’t remember which command I needed when I had the \index{\something} problem (probably something similar, i.e. a self defined command that changed the text of the index entry).
%%%% begin tex example Oh, this is also nice. But isn’t the Lua version faster? (I have >600 person entries and a few hundred locations).
Hard to say without testing but the difference can be ignored because \index itself is what take processing time.
Ok, thank you! Hraban
participants (3)
-
Henning Hraban Ramm
-
Jairo A. del Rio
-
Wolfgang Schuster