The only place in the source where bTC is mentioned is in tabl-ntb.mkiv (and tabl-ntb.mkii), which says says \unexpanded\def\bTC#1\eTC{\bTD#1\eTD} \let\eTC\relax \unexpanded\def\bTX#1\eTX{\bTD#1\eTD} \let\eTX\relax \unexpanded\def\bTY#1\eTY{\bTR#1\eTR} \let\eTY\relax I guess that means \bTC and \bTD are the same (as is \bTX). /Mikael On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:42 AM, wrote:

What is the difference between TD and TC in \bTD, \bTC , \eTD, and \eTC ?

--------------------------------

\starttext

\bTABLE \bTR \bTC one \eTC \bTC two \eTC \bTC three \eTC \eTR \bTR \bTD one \eTD \bTD two \eTD \bTD three \eTD \eTR \eTABLE

\stoptext

-------------------------------- result looks the same to me..?

Thanks ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Am 12.05.2014 um 09:42 schrieb hwitloc@gmail.com:

What is the difference between TD and TC in \bTD, \bTC , \eTD, and \eTC ?

--------------------------------

\starttext

\bTABLE \bTR \bTC one \eTC \bTC two \eTC \bTC three \eTC \eTR \bTR \bTD one \eTD \bTD two \eTD \bTD three \eTD \eTR \eTABLE

\stoptext

-------------------------------- result looks the same to me..?

The two groups - \bTC … \eTC and - \bTX … \eTX are the same as \bTD … \eTD and the group - \bTY … \eTY is the same as \bTR … \eTR. Wolfgang