equation numbering: subfurmulas
I took the following document as a source: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/images/b/b4/Mathalign.pdf (Btw: Aditya, why isn't the latest version also on http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf?) Section 4.2 says one thing and does the other ... I want to have my equations numbered as a_1 = (1,0,0) (1a) a_2 = (0,1,0) (1b) a_3 = (0,0,1) (1c) and then reference them as equation (1). The example from Aditya's document says the following: \placesubformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula But if I try that in MKII, I get (0a) and (0b), while if I try that in MKIV, I get (1) and (2). How do I get (1a) and (1b) with both MKII and MKIV? Mojca (I'm asking about MKII since I have a completely different problem with every new MKIV version released and I really need to finish that document even if MKIV crashes or a nuclear war starts ... :) :) :)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:12, Mojca Miklavec
I took the following document as a source: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/images/b/b4/Mathalign.pdf (Btw: Aditya, why isn't the latest version also on http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf?)
Section 4.2 says one thing and does the other ...
Indeed. I just downloaded the 30 May 2010 version of Mathalign.pdf from the link you provided and visual inspection of the section 4.2 reveals no subformula equation labels in the examples. All tags are numbered from (10) to (28) and non is in the form of (1a). It seems that subformulas did not work for the author either. --Leo--
participants (2)
-
Leo Razoumov
-
Mojca Miklavec