Bibliography: I think module [aps] is rendering incorrectly the electronic category and others too
Looking at context documentations and source code, it says that for electronic category we have: * Required fields: title * Optional fields: address, author, howpublished, month, note, organization, url, year, doi So, when I run this simple code: \startbuffer[example] @ELECTRONIC {example, title = "One title", url = "http://www.example.org", } \stopbuffer \usebtxdefinitions[aps] \definebtxdataset[basic] \usebtxdataset[basic][example.buffer] \definebtxrendering [basic] [aps] [dataset=basic] \setupbtx[dataset=basic] \nocite[example] \starttext \placelistofpublications[basic] \stoptext I've got an output that is similar with: [1] , One title, http://www.example.org (unpublished) which seems incorrect to me (author should not be rendered, and I was expecting year not to be accounted for too). Am I doing something wrong? Thanks in advance Tomás PS. Original question was posted here: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/480416/bibliography-what-is-the-corr...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:16:04 -0300
Tomas Badan
The APS style definitions currently expect: "author", "collaboration", "organization" and, indeed, if there is none, it should not include the comma. So the texdefinition (in publ-imp-aps.mkvi) should be changed to: \starttexdefinition unexpanded btx:aps:author \btxdoif {author} { \btxflush{author} \btxcomma } \stoptexdefinition Secondly, why do you expect not to have (unpublished)? The APS style guides suggest that unpublished material should be labeled "unpublished" or "private communication". Alan
participants (2)
-
Alan Braslau
-
Tomas Badan