On 22-7-2010 5:07, Vedran Miletić wrote:

2010/7/22 Otared Kavian:

...

Dear Hans,

I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing context --version I get:

MTXrun | main context file: /context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2010.06.23 12:45

Maybe have you changed the way the versions are numbered, but I wanted to make sure whether this is is normal or not.

However I should say that everything works fine and as expected.

With my best regards: OK

Same here. Perhaps Mojca is busy and minimals didn't get updated.

\edef\contextversion{2010.07.22 15:19} zip on the website, synced each hour on the garden Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 22-7-2010 5:23, Otared Kavian wrote:

Hi Hans,

Thanks for your attention. I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}

Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the minimal is indeed created on Wednsday June 23, 2010, at 12:45

strange Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 22-7-2010 5:33, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:

...

Hi Hans,

Thanks for your attention. I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}

Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the minimal is indeed created on Wednsday June 23, 2010, at 12:45

Best regards: OK

FYI: I observed the same behavior and fetched the new beta manually this afternoon.

strange, when i fetch the zip from the website it has a context.tex of july ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:23, Otared Kavian wrote:

Hi Hans,

Thanks for your attention. I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}

Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the minimal is indeed created on Wednsday June 23, 2010, at 12:45

Best regards: OK

On 22 juil. 2010, at 17:14, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

On 22-7-2010 5:07, Vedran Miletić wrote:

...

2010/7/22 Otared Kavian:

...

Dear Hans,

I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing context --version I get:

MTXrun | main context file: /context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2010.06.23 12:45

Maybe have you changed the way the versions are numbered, but I wanted to make sure whether this is is normal or not.

However I should say that everything works fine and as expected.

With my best regards: OK

Same here. Perhaps Mojca is busy and minimals didn't get updated.

\edef\contextversion{2010.07.22 15:19}

zip on the website, synced each hour on the garden

Hans

Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32 version), but the version is alway the same: E:\>context --version MTXrun | main context file: C:/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2010.06.23 12:45

Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:

On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:

...

Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32 version), but the version is alway the same:

sure, as i didn't update context for a week

this exchange you should be archieved in contextgarden's humor section ;o)) st.

2010/7/23 Vedran Miletić :

2010/7/22 Steffen Wolfrum :

...

Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:

...

On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:

...

Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32 version), but the version is alway the same:

sure, as i didn't update context for a week

this exchange you should be archieved in contextgarden's humor section ;o))

+1 :D You all are presuming that Hans *always* in public announce a new release...

-- luigi

Hi, Otared Kavian wrote:

So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched with the zip file on the Pragma's website.

The minimals do not sync from the public website but from an internal server, and it turns out that the zip files on that machine are not up to date yet. Hans is looking into it. Best wishes, Taco

2010/7/22 Vnpenguin :

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

Hi,

Otared Kavian wrote:

...

So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched with the zip file on the Pragma's website.

The minimals do not sync from the public website but from an internal server, and it turns out that the zip files on that machine are not up to date yet. Hans is looking into it.

Just update with first-setup.bat and I have version "2010.07.22 19:04" of ConTeXt now :)

Same here, great :-) I also seem to be getting the error: This is MetaPost, version 1.500 (kpathsea version 3.5.7dev) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/metafun.mp (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-base.mp Preloading the plain mem file, version 0.63) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-tool.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-spec.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-core.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-page.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-text.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-txts.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-shap.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-butt.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-char.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-step.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-grph.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-figs.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-mlib.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-grid.mp (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-form.mp (/opt/context/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp) (/opt/context/tex/texmf/metapost/base/marith.mp (/opt/context/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp)))) (/opt/context/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-func.mp) ) (end occurred when if on line 26 was incomplete) (see the transcript file for additional information) Regards, -- Vedran Miletić

Hans Hagen wrote:

you shouldn't run mp 1.5 as it's a quite experimental version, the prelude to 2.0; the error is probably related to the fact that formats are no longer dealt with in the same way

I don't think minimal (beta) users have a choice in the matter at the moment. Best wishes, Taco

On 22-7-2010 9:47, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

Hi,

Hans Hagen wrote:

...

the error is probably related to the fact that formats are no longer dealt with in the same way

Actually, this particular warning is a glitch in itself, it seems a (quite harmless) case of forgetting to clear the condition state.

Nevertheless, there are numerous other problems with mpost 1.500 that I have already fixed, so I may well release 1.501 tomorrow just to get rid of the most obnoxious bugs in 1.500.

A side note: besides the alpha state of the code, running mpost 1.500 to dump a mem file is pointless: all it does is generate a log file, no actual mem file is created. This is by design:

$ metafun myfile

if 'metafun' is a link to mpost version, simply loads 'metafun.mp' as a preloaded source file instead of looking for an actual metafun.mem.

indeed, so normally it should not matter (i'm not sure if we have similar side effects as tex would have due to inimode and everyjob etc) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 22-7-2010 5:03, Otared Kavian wrote:

Dear Hans,

I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing context --version I get:

MTXrun | main context file: /context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2010.06.23 12:45

Maybe have you changed the way the versions are numbered, but I wanted to make sure whether this is is normal or not.

not that i know of (or i might have forgotten already) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------