Re: [NTG-context] Equivalent of Includeonly?
Sorry, I did not get you. I was asking about Context, not Latex?! m 19.11.2012 12:00, schrieb ntg-context-request@ntg.nl:
see http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente if you are familiar with german.
Suppose you have a 1500 pages document, but you really work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....
with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but with correct page numbers and correct references.
With only \input chap7 you have wrong page numbers and missing references
Herbert
Am 20.11.2012 09:20, schrieb "H. Özoguz":
Sorry, I did not get you. I was asking about Context, not Latex?!
sure, I only explained the difference of \input and \include respectively \includeonly and explained only the existing behaviour in LaTeX. The same should be possible in ConTeXt. Herbert
m 19.11.2012 12:00, schrieb ntg-context-request@ntg.nl:
see http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente if you are familiar with german.
Suppose you have a 1500 pages document, but you really work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....
with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but with correct page numbers and correct references.
With only \input chap7 you have wrong page numbers and missing references
Herbert
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
participants (2)
-
"H. Özoguz"
-
Herbert Voss