Hello, I have tested those „new“ commands for footnotes and it seems some of them don't work properly. I like footnotes' numbers aligned to the left side of the main text. On wiki is: \setupnotation[footnote][location=left,width=1cm] \setupnote[footnote][location=page,numbercommand=] This simply does not work. I have combined location, alternative and page parameter in both commands, \setupnotation as well as \setupnote, nothing works now for me. The second bad thing is it ignores my numbercommands. It was easy to use it before when I needed numbers as not-indexed or in case I have whole notes and numbers as sans. In source for mkiv I see: \setupnotes [\c!location=\v!page, ... but simple \setupnotes[location=page] does nothing. Is the work still in progress or am I missing something? Thanks, Honza
Am 19.03.2012 um 08:55 schrieb Honza Hejzl:
Hello,
I have tested those „new“ commands for footnotes and it seems some of them don't work properly. I like footnotes' numbers aligned to the left side of the main text. On wiki is:
\setupnotation[footnote][location=left,width=1cm] \setupnote[footnote][location=page,numbercommand=]
This simply does not work. I have combined location, alternative and page parameter in both commands, \setupnotation as well as \setupnote, nothing works now for me. The second bad thing is it ignores my numbercommands. It was easy to use it before when I needed numbers as not-indexed or in case I have whole notes and numbers as sans.
The “location” key for \setupnotation has changed to “alternative” and the “numbercommand” key belongs also to \setupnotation.
In source for mkiv I see:
\setupnotes [\c!location=\v!page,
... but simple \setupnotes[location=page] does nothing.
Why should this change something when it’s already the default setting, \setupnotes[location=page] does only mean to place the footnote block at the bottom of the page. Wolfgang
participants (3)
-
Honza Hejzl
-
Thomas A. Schmitz
-
Wolfgang Schuster