Hi all! TEXEXEC documentation and self documented 'texexec.rme' file says that it should be copied to 'texexec.ini'. First of all; I have two 'texexec.rme' in TeX tree; first in ...TeX/context/config the second in ...TeX/context/perltk Files looks to be identical but and the second location has a priority. But which location is more convenient for texexec config file? The second question is WHY I have to copy 'texexec.rme' to 'texexec.ini'? If I do so and change some settings in 'texexec.ini' and than run 'texexec --verbose', I can see that settings are still taken from 'texexec.rme'. Could You tell me what is the point in copying RME to INI and when INI file is used instead RME? Thanks, Pawe/l
Hi,
Files looks to be identical but and the second location has a priority. But which location is more convenient for texexec config file?
I put mine in a path that never gets touched by an update of ConTeXt. So I don't have to worry about it.
The second question is WHY I have to copy 'texexec.rme' to 'texexec.ini'? If I do so and change some settings in 'texexec.ini' and than run 'texexec --verbose', I can see that settings are still taken from 'texexec.rme'. Could You tell me what is the point in copying RME to INI and when INI file is used instead RME?
Please post the relevant output (the few lines) of texexec --verbose What system are you using? please run: kpsewhich --format="other text files" -progname=context texexec.rme kpsewhich --format="other text files" -progname=context texexec.ini if you are using a web2c based system (tetex, texlive, fptex...) Patrick -- You are your own rainbow!
participants (2)
-
Patrick Gundlach
-
Pawel Jackowski na Onet