Taco Hoekwater wrote:

luigi scarso wrote:

...

On my linux box32bit $>bash first-setup.sh

stops with Beta is a tad unstable at the moment, should be better in an hour or so. It seems that the real problem is in setup/linux-64/bin files which are rsync'ed by first-run.sh before running mtxrun. So, it is not even possible to install an old ConTeXt using minimals.

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 16:50, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:

...

Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

...

On my linux box32bit $>bash first-setup.sh

stops with Beta is a tad unstable at the moment, should be better in an hour or so. It seems that the real problem is in setup/linux-64/bin files which are rsync'ed by first-run.sh before running mtxrun. So, it is not even

luigi scarso wrote: possible to install an old ConTeXt using minimals.

It should be fixed soon (Hans already sent a patch that fixes it), but in the meantime you may comment out the line that syncs mtxrun and take an older mtxrun.lua -> mtxrun from archive (for example from current).

I'm a bit afraid that the new texmfcnf.lua that is needed will break the "current" though. Yes, it breaks "current". Could you please either fix it in beta, or post

Mojca Miklavec wrote: the patch to ML?

On 09/06/10 14:02, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:

...

Could you please either fix it in beta, or post the patch to ML?

Does it now work again?

Mojca

Works for me. -- Michael Murphy

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to run 'texexec --make en' by hand. I don't know if that is normal?

Everything else seems to work fine.

Not here on my linux 32 bit box : MTXrun | run: mktexlsr sh: mktexlsr: not found /opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/bin/mtxrun:9270: cannot open tree:////opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/tex/texmf-project/: No such file or directory but texmf-project exists -- luigi

On 09/06/10 15:15, Andreas Schneider wrote:

luigi scarso wrote:

...

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

At least it seems ok now in a fresh install. I just did one of those, and there is only one thing that I noticed: I had to run 'texexec --make en' by hand. I don't know if that is normal?

Everything else seems to work fine.

Not here on my linux 32 bit box :

MTXrun | run: mktexlsr sh: mktexlsr: not found

/opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/bin/mtxrun:9270: cannot open tree:////opt/luatex/minimals-beta-2010/tex/texmf-project/: No such file or directory but texmf-project exists

Same here, but it can be "easily" circumvented by sourcing setuptex first. (in my case: source tex/setuptex&& sh first-setup.sh)

But the stubs, or mtxrun, or whatever handles that usually indeed doesn't seem to set paths correctly anymore. On Windows I could have texworks just call context.exe and everything worked, now I have to make sure, setuptex.bat was executed first.

Seems I spoke too soon: I can indeed get hold of the latest version, but if I want an older version (like --context=2010.06.24), I run into the same problem as luigi. And I do want an older version, since for some reason the kerning is a bit screwed up on current. -- Michael Murphy

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:34, Michael Murphy wrote:

On 09/06/10 15:15, Andreas Schneider wrote:

Seems I spoke too soon: I can indeed get hold of the latest version, but if I want an older version (like --context=2010.06.24),

I would like that version too :) :) :) :)

I run into the same problem as luigi. And I do want an older version, since for some reason the kerning is a bit screwed up on current.

There are basically two problems. Problem nr. 1 with an easy solution: 1.) syncing luatools has been disabled if platform == 'mswin' then bin = bin:gsub("([a-zA-Z]):/", "/cygdrive/%1/") texroot = texroot:gsub("([a-zA-Z]):/", "/cygdrive/%1/") command = string.format("%s -t %s/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua/%s.lua %s/texmf-mswin/bin/", bin, texroot, script, texroot) else command = string.format("%s -tgo --chmod=a+x %s/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua/%s.lua %s/texmf-%s/bin/%s", bin, texroot, script, texroot, platform, script) end Hans, can you please re-enable syncing of luatools, but in case of non-windows taking %s/texmf-context/scripts/context/stubs/unix/%s instead of %s/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua/%s.lua and in case of windows check if that *.lua exists; if yes, copy it, else ignore it. It would be nice to keep support for at least the latest "ConTeXt current", at least until the next current is out. Michael, if you want to fix it manually, just copy the old version of luatools.lua from scripts/context/stubs/unix. The problem #2 is that despite my desire to have backward-compatible cnf file, apparently luatools is not able to read in the new format. A home-made solution: in texmf/web2c/texmfcnf.lua remove everything but the last line that sets TEXMFCACHE. Mojca

On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an error.

how about adding texmf-project and texmf-fonts (maybe with a dummy readme in the root) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...

I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an error.

how about adding texmf-project and texmf-fonts (maybe with a dummy readme in the root)

I could, but aren't there enough trees already? We could add a global README saying that one may add those two trees if one wishes. I have found texmf-project really useful; for fonts I simply create a font tds like texmf-project/fonts/opentype/public/libertine

and it works well too; otherwise I use that one under texmf, ie texmf/fonts/opentype/public/poltawski -- luigi

On 10-6-2010 6:03, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:35, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

On 9-6-2010 3:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...

I have also noticed the complaint about missing texmf-project. It should be harmless, but it may be better not to make it look like an error.

how about adding texmf-project and texmf-fonts (maybe with a dummy readme in the root)

I could, but aren't there enough trees already? We could add a global README saying that one may add those two trees if one wishes.

well, they are supported in the cnf and i always use them -) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------