\goto with references which don't exist, how to spot?
Hello, I use something like \goto{chapter}[some-reference] where this chapter is not yet written (and thus I have later to check whether it is indeed called 'some-reference' and not by chance 'some-other-reference'). Unfortunally, ConTeXt writes 'chapter' and not e.g. chapter~{\bf ??} or chapter~$\blacksquare$ or something else which is easily spotable. (I like the square, a '\bf ??' is too easily be overlooked.). How can I make ConTeXt show such a sign if it cannot resolve a reference? Tobias
At 14:30 17/12/2003, you wrote:
Hello,
I use something like \goto{chapter}[some-reference] where this chapter is not yet written (and thus I have later to check whether it is indeed called 'some-reference' and not by chance 'some-other-reference').
Unfortunally, ConTeXt writes 'chapter' and not e.g. chapter~{\bf ??} or chapter~$\blacksquare$ or something else which is easily spotable. (I like the square, a '\bf ??' is too easily be overlooked.).
How can I make ConTeXt show such a sign if it cannot resolve a reference?
How about something: \let\normalunknownreference\unknownreference \def\unknownreference{\clap{\blackrule[width=.5ex,height=max,depth=max]}\normalunknownreference} Hans
Hello again, On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:30:38PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I use something like \goto{chapter}[some-reference] where this chapter is not yet written (and thus I have later to check whether it is indeed called 'some-reference' and not by chance 'some-other-reference').
I actually wanted to use \in{chapter}[some-reference] in which case {\bf ??} appears. Nethertheless, is there a way to make dangling \goto{} refernces more obvious? And I'd still like to see something more visible than '??' for \in. If one does the $n$-th iteration and glances at the pages one can easily miss those. Tobias
At 15:26 17/12/2003, you wrote:
Hello again,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:30:38PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I use something like \goto{chapter}[some-reference] where this chapter is not yet written (and thus I have later to check whether it is indeed called 'some-reference' and not by chance 'some-other-reference').
I actually wanted to use \in{chapter}[some-reference] in which case {\bf ??} appears. Nethertheless, is there a way to make dangling \goto{} refernces more obvious? And I'd still like to see something more visible than '??' for \in. If one does the $n$-th iteration and glances at the pages one can easily miss those.
\def\dummyreference{{\tttf HOW STUPID TO FORGET THIS ONE}} Hans
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Tobias Burnus