\setuplist[alternative=g] bug with interactive document
Hi Wolfgang, I have a with \setuplist[alternative=g] in an interactive document. Here you have the minimal sample: \setupinteraction[state=start] \setupcombinedlist[content][interaction=all] \setuplist[part][alternative=g] \setuplist[chapter][alternative=d] \starttext \completecontent \part{part} \chapter{chapter} \part{part} \stoptext The second \part should start a new line. I now that you told me that I was misusing “alternative=g”, because it was meant for interactive documents (but this is exactly what I have). Sorry, but since I got no reply, I'm still wondering whether this is a bug or an illegitimate use of “alternative=g”. Would you be so kind to explain what is wrong here. Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
Am 19.02.2012 um 23:00 schrieb Pablo Rodríguez:
Hi Wolfgang,
I have a with \setuplist[alternative=g] in an interactive document.
Here you have the minimal sample:
\setupinteraction[state=start] \setupcombinedlist[content][interaction=all] \setuplist[part][alternative=g] \setuplist[chapter][alternative=d] \starttext \completecontent \part{part} \chapter{chapter} \part{part} \stoptext
The second \part should start a new line. I now that you told me that I was misusing “alternative=g”, because it was meant for interactive documents (but this is exactly what I have).
Sorry, but since I got no reply, I'm still wondering whether this is a bug or an illegitimate use of “alternative=g”.
Would you be so kind to explain what is wrong here.
The alternative d put’s all entries in a single line and this works perfect when you have a parent with alternative a–c. The alternatives e–g have also this requirement but I guess they aren’t meant to be used in combination with other alternatives. Wolfgang
On 20-2-2012 10:58, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The alternative d put’s all entries in a single line and this works perfect when you have a parent with alternative a–c. The alternatives e–g have also this requirement but I guess they aren’t meant to be used in combination with other alternatives.
e-g are mostly meant for screen documents and for instance have framed content (for menus etc) and such lists are normally not nested in a-c one can do things like pagenumber=no to simplify a list Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 02/20/2012 12:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 20-2-2012 10:58, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The alternative d put’s all entries in a single line and this works perfect when you have a parent with alternative a–c. The alternatives e–g have also this requirement but I guess they aren’t meant to be used in combination with other alternatives.
e-g are mostly meant for screen documents and for instance have framed content (for menus etc) and such lists are normally not nested
in a-c one can do things like pagenumber=no to simplify a list.
Many thanks, Wolfgang and Hans, for your replies. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Pablo Rodríguez -
Wolfgang Schuster