Can someone confirm this? It seems that the equation reference mechanism is broken some time in the recent past. I have a small example done in (1) ConTeXt ver: 2011.07.13 20:14 MKIV (2) ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.17 23:31 MKIV These are respectively the first and last pdf's below. If true, it is very serious for me, because the I cannot prepare the upcoming texts for my students! Furthermore: \pagereference now introduces spurious white. For the bad vertical spacing on the left I have submitted a tentative bugfix to Hans Hagen. Hans van der Meer \setuppapersize[A6][A6] \setupformulae[spacebefore=0pt,spaceafter=0pt] \starttext \placeformula[eq:one]\startformula a = 1 \stopformula \placeformula[-]\startformula a = 2 \stopformula \placeformula[eq:three]\startformula a = 3 \stopformula \pagereference[ref:p] Refer equation-1: \in{equ=<}[eq:one]> in page \at[ref:p].\par Refer equation-3: \in{equ=<}[eq:three]> in page \at[ref:p].\par \stoptext
Dear Hans, Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 12:29 +0100 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Can someone confirm this? It seems that the equation reference mechanism is broken some time in the recent past. I have a small example done in (1) ConTeXt ver: 2011.07.13 20:14 MKIV (2) ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.17 23:31 MKIV These are respectively the first and last pdf's below.
If true, it is very serious for me, because the I cannot prepare the upcoming texts for my students!
this is a known problem. Please take a look at [1] Re: [NTG-context] No numbers with `\ref` and floats like `\placetable` where Wolfgang proposed a quick fix if you are not using sub formulas and Re: [NTG-context] Edid of reference in Wiki where Hans responded he wanted to take a look this weekend.
Furthermore: \pagereference now introduces spurious white.
Please open a now thread for this.
For the bad vertical spacing on the left I have submitted a tentative bugfix to Hans Hagen.
Thank you for cooking up a patch! Thanks, Paul [1] http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/062930.html
participants (2)
-
Hans van der Meer -
Paul Menzel