Math integral symbols (cambria) , MK-IV
Hi, When using font Cambria, the integral symbols \iint and \iiint look funny compared to \int. The contour, surface and volume integrals look fine. Version ConText version 2010.02.25 19:46. LuaTeX version 50,0 Test file \usetypescript[cambria] \setupbodyfont[cambria] \starttext \startformula \startalign[n=2] \NC \text{integral} \NC \int_{a}^{b} \NR \NC \text{double integral} \NC \iint_{a}^{b} \NR \NC \text{triple integral} \NC \iiint_{a}^{b} \NR \NC \text{contour integral} \NC \oint_{a}^{b} \NR \NC \text{surface integral} \NC \oiint_{a}^{b} \NR \NC \text{volume integral} \NC \oiiint_{a}^{b} \NR \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, gummybears wrote:
Hi,
When using font Cambria, the integral symbols \iint and \iiint look funny compared to \int.
\iint and iiint are set using \repeatintegrals and it seems that for some reason they are in textsize rather than displaysize. I will have a look. Hans, we really need a fallback mechanism. Since cambria actually contains the iint and iiint glyphs, we do not need to compose the character for it. For LM etc., we need the composed character. Right now, if I add anything in fallback key in char-def.lua, it is simply ignored. Aditya
participants (2)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
gummybears